Razzle Dazzle is Rubbish

[carlosisgod123]

Who won the world cup? Who is leading the super 14?

Certainly wasn't the pacific all stars or the Blues.

Just goes to show that true intelligence prevails over razzle dazzle rubbish.

 

[woosaah]

thats classic, especially coming from some one whos name resembles the most useless of the razzle dazzle in carlos haha

 

[Steve-o]

Booya!

 

[melon]

thats classic, especially coming from some one whos name resembles the most useless of the razzle dazzle in carlos haha [/b]

woosaah

 

[Gavin]

Who won the world cup? Who is leading the super 14?

Certainly wasn't the pacific all stars or the Blues.

Just goes to show that true intelligence prevails over razzle dazzle rubbish.

[/b]

Is there any point in this Post? You must back up your opinion. First of all South Africa won the 2007 Rugby World Cup with cool heads, but they did show some razzle dazzle. Are you perhaps referring to the Final where the game definately didn't produce any razzle dazzle? Both teams played a slow game due to many factors;

1. Both teams played a defensive game
2. Nerves
3. Jonny Wilkinson and his kicking game
4. South Africa wanting to win the game, but not lose it

My dear Carlosisgod123, razzle dazzle is only produced if both teams are willing to throw the ball around, or if one team is completely out of their depth, eg. Wales vs Fiji in the 2007 World Cup where both teams were willing to throw the ball around, and Italy vs New Zealand in the 2007 World Cup where Italy were out of their depths and didn't see the black cloud coming. In another point the 1987 Rugby World Cup was won by razzle dazzle. That All Black side just blew everyone aside. Finally how can you say that the leader of the Super14, the Crusaders, are not razzle dazzle? With players like Daniel Carter, Stephen Brett, Casey Laulala and Scott Hamilton they surely must do some razzle dazzling? Have you never just sat back and thought *Man these Crusaders can play rugby* or *They make everything seem so easy* or *Jesus Christ, how did they do that* Although to be fair the Crusaders have true rugby intelligence.

 

[Juggernaut]

<div class='quotemain'> Who won the world cup? Who is leading the super 14?

Certainly wasn't the pacific all stars or the Blues.

Just goes to show that true intelligence prevails over razzle dazzle rubbish.

[/b]

Is there any point in this Post? You must back up your opinion. First of all South Africa won the 2007 Rugby World Cup with cool heads, but they did show some razzle dazzle. Are you perhaps referring to the Final where the game definately didn't produce any razzle dazzle? Both teams played a slow game due to many factors;

1. Both teams played a defensive game
2. Nerves
3. Jonny Wilkinson and his kicking game
4. South Africa wanting to win the game, but not lose it

My dear Carlosisgod123, razzle dazzle is only produced if both teams are willing to throw the ball around, or if one team is completely out of their depth, eg. Wales vs Fiji in the 2007 World Cup where both teams were willing to throw the ball around, and Italy vs New Zealand in the 2007 World Cup where Italy were out of their depths and didn't see the black cloud coming. In another point the 1987 Rugby World Cup was won by razzle dazzle. That All Black side just blew everyone aside. Finally how can you say that the leader of the Super14, the Crusaders, are not razzle dazzle? With players like Daniel Carter, Stephen Brett, Casey Laulala and Scott Hamilton they surely must do some razzle dazzling? Have you never just sat back and thought *Man these Crusaders can play rugby* or *They make everything seem so easy* or *Jesus Christ, how did they do that* Although to be fair the Crusaders have true rugby intelligence.

[/b][/quote]

you were going great until you mentioned Scott Hamilton & razzle dazzle in the same sentence. :wall:

 

[Ripper]

Scott Hamilton is only razzle, and that can only be used to describe his hair.

 

[Gavin]

<div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotemain'> Who won the world cup? Who is leading the super 14?

Certainly wasn't the pacific all stars or the Blues.

Just goes to show that true intelligence prevails over razzle dazzle rubbish.

[/b]

Is there any point in this Post? You must back up your opinion. First of all South Africa won the 2007 Rugby World Cup with cool heads, but they did show some razzle dazzle. Are you perhaps referring to the Final where the game definately didn't produce any razzle dazzle? Both teams played a slow game due to many factors;

1. Both teams played a defensive game
2. Nerves
3. Jonny Wilkinson and his kicking game
4. South Africa wanting to win the game, but not lose it

My dear Carlosisgod123, razzle dazzle is only produced if both teams are willing to throw the ball around, or if one team is completely out of their depth, eg. Wales vs Fiji in the 2007 World Cup where both teams were willing to throw the ball around, and Italy vs New Zealand in the 2007 World Cup where Italy were out of their depths and didn't see the black cloud coming. In another point the 1987 Rugby World Cup was won by razzle dazzle. That All Black side just blew everyone aside. Finally how can you say that the leader of the Super14, the Crusaders, are not razzle dazzle? With players like Daniel Carter, Stephen Brett, Casey Laulala and Scott Hamilton they surely must do some razzle dazzling? Have you never just sat back and thought *Man these Crusaders can play rugby* or *They make everything seem so easy* or *Jesus Christ, how did they do that* Although to be fair the Crusaders have true rugby intelligence.

[/b][/quote]

you were going great until you mentioned Scott Hamilton & razzle dazzle in the same sentence. :wall:



[/b][/quote]

Fair point I made a mistake.