Red Card Question

Discussion in 'General Rugby Union' started by Dave Davies, Aug 13, 2019.

  1. Dave Davies

    Dave Davies Academy Player

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2018
    Messages:
    410
    Location:
    Boston, MA (USA)
    Country Flag:

    United States

    Hey, my friends,
    A lot of controversy about the Scott Barrett red card this weekend. I’m such a noob, I doubt my take would hold water, but all the discussions and disagreements about it lead me to a different question...
    If one player in a match does exactly what Barrett did, and it was in minute 1, that team loses that player for 79 minutes plus.
    Same day, another game, a player basically kicks someone in the groin, getting red carded at minute 79.
    Team one loses almost an entire game, team two loses almost nothing. Doesn’t that mean the red card system is inherently unbalanced?
    Asking for a friend lol
     
  2. Forum Ad Advertisement

  3. Jabby

    Jabby First XV

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2010
    Messages:
    2,526
    Country Flag:

    New Zealand

    Club or Nation:

    Otago

    its not unbalanced if you don't do stupid stuff in the first place
     
    • Like Like x 5
  4. Cruz_del_Sur

    Cruz_del_Sur First XV

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2011
    Messages:
    2,481
    Location:
    Yurop
    Country Flag:

    Argentina

    Club or Nation:

    CASI

    Unbalanced would mean, necessarily, that it favours one team over the other.
    The rules are the same for both teams, so no, it is not unbalanced.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Dave Davies

    Dave Davies Academy Player

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2018
    Messages:
    410
    Location:
    Boston, MA (USA)
    Country Flag:

    United States

    Well put, buddy. The effects of individual red cards are different, but the threat is the same, the risk is the same. Fair. :)
     
  6. Which Tyler

    Which Tyler First XV

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Messages:
    3,734
    Location:
    Tewkesbury
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bath

    Not really, but red cards are just a part of the disciplinary process, and lead to an automatic citing
     
  7. Rinkadink

    Rinkadink Academy Player

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2016
    Messages:
    323
    Club or Nation:

    Bristol

    Kind of related; things canny teams will do if they build a lead and have given the ref a good picture during it: you know you will come under pressure at some point so essentially have "free" outs. Can be slower moving away from rucks for example, likely warnings first. You can give away pens in your red zone and frustrate your opponent and waste time. You will often hear refs say things like, "We have had a good [x amount of time], let's not spoil it", etc. Even if you cop a yellow the time is on your side. Earlier yellows often resort in more fatigue late on but teams tend to do better defending with 14 during that period.

    I wish refs punished cynical play more harshly, you see it at every level.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Dave Davies

    Dave Davies Academy Player

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2018
    Messages:
    410
    Location:
    Boston, MA (USA)
    Country Flag:

    United States

    Similar thing in the NFL ... when you're on defense near your goal line, go ahead and commit holding if you have to, because the penalty is always half the distance to the goal line. Defending one yard away rather than two doesn't make much difference. But I agree, when it becomes obvious, especially with scrum resets, it makes me wish the refs would do more. I know a lot of people were unhappy with Jerome Garces this past weekend, but I did appreciate his tendency to let them play on. There was that scrum where it completely collapsed and he told them to play it anyway, which looked kind of ridiculous, but inside I was like, "Thank god, no reset!"
     
  9. BobbyM

    BobbyM Academy Player

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2016
    Messages:
    315
    Country Flag:

    Scotland

    Club or Nation:

    Hurricanes

    And if you have someone who gets sent off in the 79th minute it implies they’ve been a good respectable player for the time up to that point. I’d struggle to think of an alternative; a team should be punished as and when they commit fouls. I also suspect (although don’t have any statistical data to back this up) but referees may view an incident differently depending on when in the game it is. So he may be more likely to give a yellow early on whereas later in the game he might give a red for it.

    In terms of punishing the offending team, there’s also the sanctioning after when players may be suspended for a period of time.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. scotty507

    scotty507 First XV

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2016
    Messages:
    1,774
    Club or Nation:

    Exeter

    I do get the point but as said its fair to both team they are in the same boat. But the red card is your teams punishment for that game. The severity of the act will depend how long of a ban he gets so a team could win that game but lose a player for many weeks. With this there is no way to balance it within the game its self.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Radsy

    Radsy Academy Player

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2017
    Messages:
    115
    Country Flag:

    Canada

    Rugby fans seem to struggle with the mere mention of adjusting the carding process. In any other sport except for round ball, severe infractions cost the player an ejection, fines, and lengthy suspensions. It costs the team a significant shorthanded period and then they move on with a shorthanded bench. In rugby, the team is effectively punished with a loss. The competitive balance of the game is ruined.

    If red cards in rugby were an automatic ejection of the player and 10 minutes shorthanded for the team, they could be handed out more readily. The inconsistency in application comes from the referees not wanting to decide the outcome of the game with one call.

    Imagine an NHL team on a power play for the whole second and third period. Imagine an NFL defense without one of their safeties for the second half of a playoff game. Imagine a MLB team with no shortstop for 7 innings. There’s not one sport where a red card like rugby’s would be accepted.

    Rugby is faster than ever. You can make it safer without ruining the competitive balance of games.
     
  12. Cruz_del_Sur

    Cruz_del_Sur First XV

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2011
    Messages:
    2,481
    Location:
    Yurop
    Country Flag:

    Argentina

    Club or Nation:

    CASI

    Not quite the same.
    14 vs 15 is not the same as 5 vs 6. Sevens might be a better comparison and when you have a red card there it's pretty much game over unless the teams are in completely different leagues.


    I don t see it that way. You win as a team, you pay the consequences as a team.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Rinkadink

    Rinkadink Academy Player

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2016
    Messages:
    323
    Club or Nation:

    Bristol

    Disagree that red cards automatically decide the fate of the match, there are plenty of examples of 14 beating 15 and even if not winning, making a good account of themselves. It just makes it harder, which is the idea and it works well.

    See the recent Australia vs New Zealand as an example of it working as intended. WBs were winning anyway, rightful red card means ABs had to change things up and work harder to win, which they could have but ultimately didn't and Australia eventually ended up breaking them mentally and physically. The added difficulty is the fault of the team who gave away the red, it would be a joke to lessen the punishment for the match. They're only reserved for severe infractions and carry with them appropriate downsides.
     
  14. ncurd

    ncurd International

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2015
    Messages:
    6,664
    Location:
    Gloucestershire
    Country Flag:

    England

    Club or Nation:

    Bath

    Your comparing American sports on ejection to every other team sport played on the planet where a red card is removal from the game and the team is shorthanded.

    As to automatic loss that's the point a red a card a deterrent, you don't want to cost your team the game, you will be blamed for it, you let the team down. If red cards only carried the team penalty of a yellow you;d see them happening more often.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. TRF_heineken

    TRF_heineken RIP #J9

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    10,430
    Location:
    Polokwane, South Africa
    Country Flag:

    South Africa

    Club or Nation:

    South Africa

    This is false though.

    There are many instances where teams got a red card, and still won the game. I think of the Crusaders vs. Sharks a couple of years ago in Christchurch where the Sharks got a red card, and managed to win the game away from home...

    Sometimes that red card brings a team closer in a game.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Peter Ross

    Peter Ross Academy Player

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2019
    Messages:
    2
    There was another example in Glasgow v Edinburgh, 23 Dec 2017.

    Watching the game at the time I thought Glasgow relaxed and waited for the easy win to happen, and 14-man Edinburgh took advantage of their complacency.

    The other side of the coin is when an offence that is perceived by the players as deserving a red card is treated leniently. That can be a big psychological blow to the team that's seen one of their players carted off.
     
  17. scotty507

    scotty507 First XV

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2016
    Messages:
    1,774
    Club or Nation:

    Exeter

    Ive seen team playing well and/ or in front then the opposition gets a red card and they change there game plan to a wide game and the other team defends and forces turn overs and goes on to win.
     
  18. Rinkadink

    Rinkadink Academy Player

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2016
    Messages:
    323
    Club or Nation:

    Bristol



    Another example of a team going down to 14 for the majority of the match and still winning.
     
Enjoyed this thread? Register to post your reply - click here!

Share This Page