Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Reviewing the Review
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Los Lover" data-source="post: 46764"><p>I'm sorry...I would like to agree or disagree accordingly with whatever you are saying...</p><p></p><p></p><p>however I speak only english.</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>as far as I can see, in my absence, people who have played rc2006 have stated it is flawed, annoying and nowhere near as good as rugby 06 (all utterly predictable and utterly predicted).....unless you think backplay isn't most important/attacking rugby most important...in which case may I suggest to those people they get the little intricacies by not being pussies and actually PLAY the game of rugby for real? Games are for fun and realism......not periodic realism and utter frustration and/or boredom.</p><p></p><p>The league was overrated and yet....if you check my post, I still defend it as it is somewhat customisable. My current version is much better than the version I spent a few hours initially playing. I had a lot of fun winning the nrl in fact and rate it close to rugby 2005, which once edited, was a passable game. I drew a game the other day 34-34 after winning 141-7...........that says a lot about the standard of opposition teams and their randomness on any given day once pumped up players and balance is reached in opposition squads. Too late to change really now as new game coming so soon........you played an8/10 game for 1year+ at a 7/10 level.......all to avoid three hours editing. I find that strange....or ignorant...or something.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, my comments on rc2006 and league were all sweet az bud. If that's what you were saying, but in Swaheli, then thanks and, yes, you are correct that I was correct. <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>As for 'halving slaes of rc2006', I see that awareness regarding the game has led many, if not MOST, to decide to hire it instead of buy....OR skip it altogether in favour of the update to rugby 2005. So, in a sense, considering I began the most intense aspects of the debate, perhaps I DID. <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>You see my beef was with lies and counter=productivity by Mario (when he pushed it further by denying it and insulting me - that was it....I bow to no one, hell, I'd knock Bush the f*** out if I ran into him in the street). My love or hate or otherwise of the game itself is not remotely affected by this. It is called amateur professionalism and is needed if one os to make consistent predictions etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Los Lover, post: 46764"] I'm sorry...I would like to agree or disagree accordingly with whatever you are saying... however I speak only english. [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif[/img] as far as I can see, in my absence, people who have played rc2006 have stated it is flawed, annoying and nowhere near as good as rugby 06 (all utterly predictable and utterly predicted).....unless you think backplay isn't most important/attacking rugby most important...in which case may I suggest to those people they get the little intricacies by not being pussies and actually PLAY the game of rugby for real? Games are for fun and realism......not periodic realism and utter frustration and/or boredom. The league was overrated and yet....if you check my post, I still defend it as it is somewhat customisable. My current version is much better than the version I spent a few hours initially playing. I had a lot of fun winning the nrl in fact and rate it close to rugby 2005, which once edited, was a passable game. I drew a game the other day 34-34 after winning 141-7...........that says a lot about the standard of opposition teams and their randomness on any given day once pumped up players and balance is reached in opposition squads. Too late to change really now as new game coming so soon........you played an8/10 game for 1year+ at a 7/10 level.......all to avoid three hours editing. I find that strange....or ignorant...or something. Anyway, my comments on rc2006 and league were all sweet az bud. If that's what you were saying, but in Swaheli, then thanks and, yes, you are correct that I was correct. [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img] As for 'halving slaes of rc2006', I see that awareness regarding the game has led many, if not MOST, to decide to hire it instead of buy....OR skip it altogether in favour of the update to rugby 2005. So, in a sense, considering I began the most intense aspects of the debate, perhaps I DID. [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif[/img] You see my beef was with lies and counter=productivity by Mario (when he pushed it further by denying it and insulting me - that was it....I bow to no one, hell, I'd knock Bush the f*** out if I ran into him in the street). My love or hate or otherwise of the game itself is not remotely affected by this. It is called amateur professionalism and is needed if one os to make consistent predictions etc. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Reviewing the Review
Top