Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Round 13: Bulls v Blues
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ozzy" data-source="post: 113414"><p>That's only if he's not riled up.</p><p>[/b]</p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p>I fully agree with that statement, the problem is the guy is aggro most of the time, there is a difference between agression and controlled agression. </p><p>As for Joe, I too believe he offers more on the wing than either wulf or tutitavake, but the fact is he HASN'T had the game time and therefore to chuck him in in a must win game when he's out of form is now a risk the Blues can't afford to take. It was stupid not to start him earlier, but that time is long gone and the current situation demands the Blues use the players who are in form.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="ozzy, post: 113414"] That's only if he's not riled up. [/b][/quote] I fully agree with that statement, the problem is the guy is aggro most of the time, there is a difference between agression and controlled agression. As for Joe, I too believe he offers more on the wing than either wulf or tutitavake, but the fact is he HASN'T had the game time and therefore to chuck him in in a must win game when he's out of form is now a risk the Blues can't afford to take. It was stupid not to start him earlier, but that time is long gone and the current situation demands the Blues use the players who are in form. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Round 13: Bulls v Blues
Top