Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Rugby Challenge Series
Rugby 2004 challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Los Lover" data-source="post: 15390"><p>I know...I know! <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>But it was actually the most fun I've ever had on the shined up piece of turd..hehe!</p><p></p><p>And now we'll see if the Nhers can beat my 91-0....which like a Judas I enjoyed far more than I had a right to!! lol! The shame of it..</p><p></p><p>Solid effort Brumbies05! King Carlos had his radar off for me!! and then when hurt they said "I think it's his knee" (which I remembered they often did...) and I cracked up b/c it was so accidently realistic!</p><p></p><p>Caps you crack me up! My average NZ efforts will get eclipsed by just about everyone I would say.....disappointed as I say cos I was playing so well in the second.....dropped a ball in the tackle over the line late in the first....and then only got one more try in about the 80th minute.</p><p></p><p>My user had about 90 pumped up players - my team and opposition teams too....so I had forgotten it was a lot more challenging (sort of) with hard and no adjusted stats.</p><p></p><p>Shivers England were good in it.</p><p></p><p>And it showed me that that whole debate about whether a team's stats were unfair in Rugby 2005, going on this last EA game, show it's really both.(the stats of the team and the squad's members themselves)...the NZ and England stats were very similar.....but England were 1 point higher in the loose and so won a LOT more rucks than I did. Their backs however (England's) were not higher on the overall team stats yet are heaps deadlier because the stats of the individual players are higher in speed and acceleration...you just put the best team on the park in terms of individuals and you could probably find parity with even England's 92 and NZs 91 ranked teams etc.....BUT if rucks remain hard to win against a team with superior "loose" ability and perhaps "scrummaging" you may not find parity of ball.</p><p></p><p>Damn! I didn't quite say that properly...but I hope you know what I mean. Just a thought.</p><p></p><p>Also...I would like to say (as a Kiwi) that I reckon SA will be a sleeper team in the game. Locksley would know by now probably. They have big forwards and fast backs (Paulse, Habana, Bobo, De Villiers etc), so it would be how you use them. I think their starting XV on the game if you were in control would be good. I think this will please the SA boys. <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>Keep the scores coming....Sorry not specifically Rugby 2005 - but it is sort of as it revolved around surviving until it.</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Los Lover, post: 15390"] I know...I know! [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img] [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img] But it was actually the most fun I've ever had on the shined up piece of turd..hehe! And now we'll see if the Nhers can beat my 91-0....which like a Judas I enjoyed far more than I had a right to!! lol! The shame of it.. Solid effort Brumbies05! King Carlos had his radar off for me!! and then when hurt they said "I think it's his knee" (which I remembered they often did...) and I cracked up b/c it was so accidently realistic! Caps you crack me up! My average NZ efforts will get eclipsed by just about everyone I would say.....disappointed as I say cos I was playing so well in the second.....dropped a ball in the tackle over the line late in the first....and then only got one more try in about the 80th minute. My user had about 90 pumped up players - my team and opposition teams too....so I had forgotten it was a lot more challenging (sort of) with hard and no adjusted stats. Shivers England were good in it. And it showed me that that whole debate about whether a team's stats were unfair in Rugby 2005, going on this last EA game, show it's really both.(the stats of the team and the squad's members themselves)...the NZ and England stats were very similar.....but England were 1 point higher in the loose and so won a LOT more rucks than I did. Their backs however (England's) were not higher on the overall team stats yet are heaps deadlier because the stats of the individual players are higher in speed and acceleration...you just put the best team on the park in terms of individuals and you could probably find parity with even England's 92 and NZs 91 ranked teams etc.....BUT if rucks remain hard to win against a team with superior "loose" ability and perhaps "scrummaging" you may not find parity of ball. Damn! I didn't quite say that properly...but I hope you know what I mean. Just a thought. Also...I would like to say (as a Kiwi) that I reckon SA will be a sleeper team in the game. Locksley would know by now probably. They have big forwards and fast backs (Paulse, Habana, Bobo, De Villiers etc), so it would be how you use them. I think their starting XV on the game if you were in control would be good. I think this will please the SA boys. [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img] Keep the scores coming....Sorry not specifically Rugby 2005 - but it is sort of as it revolved around surviving until it. [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
Rugby Challenge Series
Rugby 2004 challenge
Top