Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
RUGBY 2005 Preview! Cybershack.com not much but...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NZL Fan" data-source="post: 7713"><p>The article is just an attention seeking bit of ********.........</p><p></p><p>Considering it's ***led "rugby 2005 - we have played it", and then they say pretty much nothing about what they experienced is a joke surely??</p><p></p><p>Generalising by saying such things as "players look much more real" (could tell that from the screens), and "gameplay is much more realistic" (would have to be compared to rugby 2004), is just poor writing.</p><p></p><p>Maybe they have given themselves a way out (if the game turns out to be utter rubbish) by saying that they only played a "work in progress" at the time of their initial impressions.</p><p></p><p>I mean thirty minutes of gameplay would be more then enough time to form some sort of initial conclusions/impressions. Why is there no mention of such basic things as how lineouts/scrums/rucks are implemented, controls, passing fluency, kicking etc etc......</p><p></p><p>I have no reason to dis-believe that they have indeed played it, however it appears they are paying HB studios "lip service" for the right of doing so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NZL Fan, post: 7713"] The article is just an attention seeking bit of ********......... Considering it's ***led "rugby 2005 - we have played it", and then they say pretty much nothing about what they experienced is a joke surely?? Generalising by saying such things as "players look much more real" (could tell that from the screens), and "gameplay is much more realistic" (would have to be compared to rugby 2004), is just poor writing. Maybe they have given themselves a way out (if the game turns out to be utter rubbish) by saying that they only played a "work in progress" at the time of their initial impressions. I mean thirty minutes of gameplay would be more then enough time to form some sort of initial conclusions/impressions. Why is there no mention of such basic things as how lineouts/scrums/rucks are implemented, controls, passing fluency, kicking etc etc...... I have no reason to dis-believe that they have indeed played it, however it appears they are paying HB studios "lip service" for the right of doing so. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
RUGBY 2005 Preview! Cybershack.com not much but...
Top