Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Rugby Teams/Country's Best XV
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Peat" data-source="post: 664901" data-attributes="member: 42330"><p>You could make a case for sticking Gibson at 10 and D'Arcy (or Miliken if you wish to get historical) at 12.</p><p></p><p>This is the problem with these things, there's a lot of players with huge reputations who we simply know nothing about. Should Paul Wallace be ahead of Syd Millar? Geoghan and Hickie ahead of Tony O'Reilly? Stringer ahead of Patterson? Do you throw Pedlow into the full-back argument? I'm just reciting names who did impressive things and who I've heard old men wax lyrical about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Peat, post: 664901, member: 42330"] You could make a case for sticking Gibson at 10 and D'Arcy (or Miliken if you wish to get historical) at 12. This is the problem with these things, there's a lot of players with huge reputations who we simply know nothing about. Should Paul Wallace be ahead of Syd Millar? Geoghan and Hickie ahead of Tony O'Reilly? Stringer ahead of Patterson? Do you throw Pedlow into the full-back argument? I'm just reciting names who did impressive things and who I've heard old men wax lyrical about. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Rugby Teams/Country's Best XV
Top