Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
SA Quotas reach a new low! Shocking!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DNAPlay" data-source="post: 135735"><p>But that's the thing - there is no equality. If the ratio was 5:2, in the favour of non-whites, then it would be "fairly" understandable (still wrong, but at least we get the point) - but what equality does it serve when you say 5:2, irrespective of which colour is in the majority. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>How's this for a scenario: </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Team A is leading by 2 goals with a few minutes to play, when suddenly, a non-white player is injured. Coach is stuck because the only available replacements are white. Does coach replace injured player with the white player, thus gifting the opposing side three goals immediately, or does coach force injured player to continue "playing"? I'm sure most would choose the latter option, which would result in the injured player just standing around pretending to play.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>It's a lose-lose-lose situation, and absolutely ridiculous.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I swear, if the powers that be were to have lobotomies, their asses would come under the scalpel. Idiots.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DNAPlay, post: 135735"] But that's the thing - there is no equality. If the ratio was 5:2, in the favour of non-whites, then it would be "fairly" understandable (still wrong, but at least we get the point) - but what equality does it serve when you say 5:2, irrespective of which colour is in the majority. How's this for a scenario: Team A is leading by 2 goals with a few minutes to play, when suddenly, a non-white player is injured. Coach is stuck because the only available replacements are white. Does coach replace injured player with the white player, thus gifting the opposing side three goals immediately, or does coach force injured player to continue "playing"? I'm sure most would choose the latter option, which would result in the injured player just standing around pretending to play. It's a lose-lose-lose situation, and absolutely ridiculous. I swear, if the powers that be were to have lobotomies, their asses would come under the scalpel. Idiots. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
SA Quotas reach a new low! Shocking!
Top