Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
Scrummaging hookers, locks and back rowers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aedaphon" data-source="post: 500126" data-attributes="member: 46333"><p>Schalk Brits <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>But seriously- Brad Thorn's impact on the Leinster scrum is clear evidence for the contribution a second row can have in the tight. In relation to back rows it's far, far harder to gauge how much of an impact they make.</p><p></p><p>The weight still makes a significant contribution but unless the tight 5 can set up the right platform all the back row will do is pile weight into an already unstable scrum.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aedaphon, post: 500126, member: 46333"] Schalk Brits ;) But seriously- Brad Thorn's impact on the Leinster scrum is clear evidence for the contribution a second row can have in the tight. In relation to back rows it's far, far harder to gauge how much of an impact they make. The weight still makes a significant contribution but unless the tight 5 can set up the right platform all the back row will do is pile weight into an already unstable scrum. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
Scrummaging hookers, locks and back rowers
Top