Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby - Trans Tasman (Round 5)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 1041626" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>That was a very crazy call. Never heard that one before. Canes' player goes shoulder to head against Red's player. Ref says the mitigation because Red's player was 'very low'. Red's captain says "but there was no change in height!". Ref dismisses it. </p><p></p><p>Could someone tag any of the resident refs (other than sc, please), maybe there is a guideline or something I missed. I thought that, as the red's captain argued, a change in height was a mitigating factor, not height itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 1041626, member: 55747"] That was a very crazy call. Never heard that one before. Canes' player goes shoulder to head against Red's player. Ref says the mitigation because Red's player was 'very low'. Red's captain says "but there was no change in height!". Ref dismisses it. Could someone tag any of the resident refs (other than sc, please), maybe there is a guideline or something I missed. I thought that, as the red's captain argued, a change in height was a mitigating factor, not height itself. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
Super Rugby - Trans Tasman (Round 5)
Top