Discussion in 'Rugby Video Games & Apps' started by locksley, Feb 27, 2005.
Argentina and Ireland should be better and England should be worse than 92 God Blimey
It was away, and you were understrength, I'll give you that. Still kicked your arse though
Yeah I totally agree the Ospreys should be much higher, but it seems to me that most of the rankings are messed up. I guess everyone can just edit to make it how they think it should be anyway!
I found these on the wrb web site and are certainly more accurate than EA's lame attempt at international ranking. Also note how many teams didnt even make it into the game!!
RANK COUNTRY RATING
1 New Zealand 90.90
2 Australia 88.58
3 South Africa 85.78
4 Ireland 84.30
5 France 83.27
6 England 82.81
7 Wales 81.43
8 Argentina 77.63
9 Scotland 74.37
10 Fiji 74.17
11 Italy 70.82
12 Samoa 70.13
13 Romania 68.61
14 Canada 68.12
15 Uruguay 66.92
16 USA 66.42
17 Portugal 66.00
18 Japan 65.00
19 Tonga 62.72
20 Georgia 61.42
21 Korea 60.25
22 Morocco 59.94
I did a little experement and swapped all the Saints squad for all the tiggers squad.
Northampton are still at 65 and the tigers are still at 81 - The players don't effect the rating
Makes the whole ratings system seem a bit pointless then really.
can someoen with the game post the Otago Highlanders Squad and And player overall stats
i searched but could not find it if it has been posted b4 could i have the link
thanks in advance
Changing players doesn't affect the rating, but I'm pretty sure the rating acts as a multiplier on exisiting player stats: therefore 2 teams with identical players will have an edge if they are on the team that has a higher rating. Similar to the way your team plays better at home than away!!! Hope I didn't just repeat something that's been said a million times before.
I guess you could think of the ratings as being equivalent to how well a team is coached!!
I just thought id help you out a little dtwelvenz i dont know where the link is for the squad and if no 1 gives u the link i could give you the ratings by writing them down but damn that would take awhile lol.
Why Horton? Wouldn't Jackson not be more suitable? His famous 'moon' move would surely pose more of a threat.
Separate names with a comma.