Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
"Ten simple and effective law changes that should be made to rugby refereeing"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kiwiwomble" data-source="post: 1165699" data-attributes="member: 45355"><p>ok, fair i guess but thats pretty extreme, almost just throws it up with no velocity backward</p><p></p><p>my stance is we should just let more **** go and stop dissecting the minutiae, BUT people wont do that and its killing the game for me (anyone on the "international rugby" facebook page? its bloody painful)...feel like almost every game there are super slow mo's breaking down the physics of at least three moving bodies....and that doesnt sound like a fun game to follow to me</p><p></p><p>so if we cant just accept some slight forward passes then i would rather they said it has to go backwards even if that means the passer need to hold they step for a second to break their momentum, will look weird but less to argue about</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kiwiwomble, post: 1165699, member: 45355"] ok, fair i guess but thats pretty extreme, almost just throws it up with no velocity backward my stance is we should just let more **** go and stop dissecting the minutiae, BUT people wont do that and its killing the game for me (anyone on the "international rugby" facebook page? its bloody painful)...feel like almost every game there are super slow mo's breaking down the physics of at least three moving bodies....and that doesnt sound like a fun game to follow to me so if we cant just accept some slight forward passes then i would rather they said it has to go backwards even if that means the passer need to hold they step for a second to break their momentum, will look weird but less to argue about [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
"Ten simple and effective law changes that should be made to rugby refereeing"
Top