Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
The Laws of the Game/Referee - Discussion Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="goodNumber10" data-source="post: 652920" data-attributes="member: 71068"><p>Well clearly it is.</p><p></p><p>This thread is proof of that as is the fact two international Refs have interpreted it differently to us.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>yes mate i have my own copy of the laws. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>But what i'm asking is, i guess, in the same way the Pads are seen as an extension of the try line is the hand seen as an extension of the ball when the attacking player is holding it?</p><p></p><p>I dunno, that's not worded very well but you get what i'm getting at - there are lots of exceptions to the laws int he games, and lots of different ways of interpreting them.</p><p></p><p>I just can't believe two international refs would rule it ok. </p><p></p><p>I mean Peyper questions the hand under the ball, when he gets the English hand reply he doesn't question it. Nor say "so held" up he just says "so no reason to not award the try?" (i'm paraphrasing there)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="goodNumber10, post: 652920, member: 71068"] Well clearly it is. This thread is proof of that as is the fact two international Refs have interpreted it differently to us. yes mate i have my own copy of the laws. :) But what i'm asking is, i guess, in the same way the Pads are seen as an extension of the try line is the hand seen as an extension of the ball when the attacking player is holding it? I dunno, that's not worded very well but you get what i'm getting at - there are lots of exceptions to the laws int he games, and lots of different ways of interpreting them. I just can't believe two international refs would rule it ok. I mean Peyper questions the hand under the ball, when he gets the English hand reply he doesn't question it. Nor say "so held" up he just says "so no reason to not award the try?" (i'm paraphrasing there) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
The Laws of the Game/Referee - Discussion Thread
Top