• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

The life of Brian

LeinsterMan (NotTigsMan)

G.O.A.T
TRF Legend
Joined
Dec 13, 2013
Messages
25,619
Country Flag
Ireland
Club or Nation
Leicester
An eye opening view of what it is like to be a bench player.

Very honest and very interesting.

[video]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kqIIBplYLJ0[/video]



A great series of YOUTUBE VIDEOS BY Brian Mujati.
 
Didn't realise he had a vlogging channel!

Really interesting video, thanks for posting.
 
Love Mooj as well, will get this on the go when it comes up on the podcast addict app I use
 
Agree on the "devolution" or however he was describing it, not bothered about Nigel.

Disagree on the notion that not playing the game to a high level bars you from serious analysis or devalues your opinion.
It's obviously a logical fallacy, otherwise there would be a clear relationship between quality of player and quality of pundit/coach... anyone who suggests that's actually the case is a moron.
 
I love rugby and i'm an avid craft beer drinker, so i had an instant click with his videos. About Owens, i agree 100%, and about the analysis part, it depends.
No matter how good the analysis looks on paper, it is not difficult to understand that they cannot talk about things they know absolutely nothing about. Scrums are the perfect example.
I'm tired of hearing commentators who've never played rationalize the most bizarre calls when a second later every former player says "********, that's a coin toss".
There are plenty, actually TONS of anecdotes from props saying the refs have no idea what goes on in the scrum, and props who can read that can milk it.

I am not saying you need to be a former pro player to be a good commentator, but it definitely helps. It is a mental game as much as it is a physical one. You can see what the player does, but it is almost impossible to imagine what the players are going through if you haven't been remotely close yourself.

O'Sullivan's comments this week are another perfect example: after pundits left and right said how the Lions's second test penalty was ok, O'Sullivan asked, if that is the case, what is the defender supposed to do? That little, minute insight apparently escaped nearly all of the people who haven't played yet didn't hesitate to comment.

I watch rugby and footie mostly. I cannot think of a single top tier broadcasting team that hasn't got former players/coaches on it (actually one, back in the 80's in Argentina). The non-players tend to play a more coordinating role and talk about the stats. The truly insightful stuff always comes from the (former) players. Non players are good at communicating what is happening. Former players (if eloquent) can add value by explaining the rationale behind it. They've done the training, they've seen plays, practiced them, played against them, know where the key points are, what could go wrong, etc.
It is nearly impossible to figure that by yourself if you have never played.

Being a former player won't make you a good pundit, but in order to be a great one i'm pretty sure it is a massive advantage.
 
Top