Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
The name?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cruz_del_Sur" data-source="post: 940260" data-attributes="member: 55747"><p>I wasnt talking about those as i dont think that would constitute appropiation. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Exactly.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I guess i wasnt clear. What i meant with hard to prove was that it is a counterfactual argument. In order to say the chiefs benefited from it you would need to have a benchmark to compare against and that would imply, necessarily, a counterfactual argument. Counterfactual arguments are speculative ones by definition. That is what i means by hard to prove. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure what is funnier, the fact that you respond by saying something doesnt warrant a response, the fact that you actually follow up by responding on the next lines, or the fact that in that parallel universe where you inhabit you are the sole authority in charge of deciding what does and what doesnt merit a response. Conveniently enough.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cruz_del_Sur, post: 940260, member: 55747"] I wasnt talking about those as i dont think that would constitute appropiation. Exactly. I guess i wasnt clear. What i meant with hard to prove was that it is a counterfactual argument. In order to say the chiefs benefited from it you would need to have a benchmark to compare against and that would imply, necessarily, a counterfactual argument. Counterfactual arguments are speculative ones by definition. That is what i means by hard to prove. Not sure what is funnier, the fact that you respond by saying something doesnt warrant a response, the fact that you actually follow up by responding on the next lines, or the fact that in that parallel universe where you inhabit you are the sole authority in charge of deciding what does and what doesnt merit a response. Conveniently enough. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Super Rugby
The name?
Top