Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
The nitpicking thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Los Lover" data-source="post: 13001"><p>Fair enough....</p><p></p><p>But I have a few issues with the classic 2 view </p><p></p><p>- it seems hard to press the offside line and go for a good hit as it is in rugby 2004 - but was easy on side....leads to claims of bulls**t offsides that are actually justified etc.....eventually control is thrown at screen after game lost to CPU dropkick in extra time because of play ensuing from set play from the ensuing ruck from the quick tap for the disputed penalty!</p><p></p><p>- You are too far away - ruining the effect and enjoyment of player likenesses - I don't like looking at people's backs!</p><p></p><p>"Go! <__>...um.....thingy!"</p><p></p><p>"Was that Carter?"</p><p></p><p>"I think so"</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> ridiculous.</p><p></p><p>- Locksley has stated that sidestepping is effective only on side view and coincidently more pleasant an experience when executed in this view as well. You're going to sacrifice running rugby's most elusive weapon?</p><p></p><p>- gaps etc are only harder to see (for vertical viewers)....they can still be seen..so if your judgement is sound it's easy enough either way.</p><p></p><p>- Hard to be precise in defence the further away you get....the intricacies and reasons behind goings-on in the rucks/mauls can be lost...</p><p></p><p>- Didn't you see the try by the centre in side view in the Bulls versus Sharks video?..devastating.</p><p></p><p>No coincidence more tries were scored in this view - it turns the console on!</p><p></p><p> <img src="http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Los Lover, post: 13001"] Fair enough.... But I have a few issues with the classic 2 view - it seems hard to press the offside line and go for a good hit as it is in rugby 2004 - but was easy on side....leads to claims of bulls**t offsides that are actually justified etc.....eventually control is thrown at screen after game lost to CPU dropkick in extra time because of play ensuing from set play from the ensuing ruck from the quick tap for the disputed penalty! - You are too far away - ruining the effect and enjoyment of player likenesses - I don't like looking at people's backs! "Go! <__>...um.....thingy!" "Was that Carter?" "I think so" [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img] ridiculous. - Locksley has stated that sidestepping is effective only on side view and coincidently more pleasant an experience when executed in this view as well. You're going to sacrifice running rugby's most elusive weapon? - gaps etc are only harder to see (for vertical viewers)....they can still be seen..so if your judgement is sound it's easy enough either way. - Hard to be precise in defence the further away you get....the intricacies and reasons behind goings-on in the rucks/mauls can be lost... - Didn't you see the try by the centre in side view in the Bulls versus Sharks video?..devastating. No coincidence more tries were scored in this view - it turns the console on! [img]http://www.therugbyforum.com/forum/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif[/img] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
Rugby Video Games & Apps
The nitpicking thread
Top