Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
The REAL story...why the AB's lost!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sambãd5" data-source="post: 167223"><p>i think alot of it had to do with realy bad timing. i think if tana was captain and playing we would have done alot better. the npc showed he was still all black material. so with no tana, we had a back line with names like lenard, carter, mcallister, mulinina, toeava and smith. yes carter and mills have had a wc under their belt, but these names, which consisted of most of our backline in the french game, were very unexperianced, and have a positive future for them. i belive that this backline in 2011 will be something worth looking at. but they were just too new. especially at centre. if tana had of been playing, it was only really 2nd 5/8 which would have had a question mark over its head. being choices of mcallister, mager or toeava.</p><p></p><p>as for smartcooky's comment on mauger, as much as i despise the guy, he might have helped. just that little bit of experiance. imo the backline the downfall was experaince. mcallister and toeava both **** all over mauger, but the experiance that he added...???</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sambãd5, post: 167223"] i think alot of it had to do with realy bad timing. i think if tana was captain and playing we would have done alot better. the npc showed he was still all black material. so with no tana, we had a back line with names like lenard, carter, mcallister, mulinina, toeava and smith. yes carter and mills have had a wc under their belt, but these names, which consisted of most of our backline in the french game, were very unexperianced, and have a positive future for them. i belive that this backline in 2011 will be something worth looking at. but they were just too new. especially at centre. if tana had of been playing, it was only really 2nd 5/8 which would have had a question mark over its head. being choices of mcallister, mager or toeava. as for smartcooky's comment on mauger, as much as i despise the guy, he might have helped. just that little bit of experiance. imo the backline the downfall was experaince. mcallister and toeava both **** all over mauger, but the experiance that he added...??? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
The REAL story...why the AB's lost!
Top