Whether or not they would play for the ABs or not is irrelevant. They are NZ born and bred players, going and getting selected for the PI teams. Clearly the PI teams feel they are stronger with these NZ players. The PI teams are benefiting from the eligibility criteria. Talent has flowed to them, not away.
That is a very far stretched speculation, at best. And you dodge the point.
Maybe those NZ born and bred players wouldn't have a spot in PI teams if the best players from the PI weren't poached by richer countries.
Maybe.
@Umaga's Witness
I enjoyed your post. Don't necessarily agree with everything but i see your pov.
At the same time if I was a woman in Pakistan I’d probably not want to live there and wouldn’t want to represent their country. So if I was the greatest rugby player in the world I wouldn’t be allowed to play for any country, by your policy.
That is just not true. You could live abroad and play for your national team, specially in non-tier 1 teams.
Now I don’t know what the answer is, and understand our philosophy underlying this is quite different.
I wholeheartedly agree with this. My case is not as tight as i'd like it to be, but i have a few non-negotiables and, given those, this is the least worse proposal i could come up with. I'm open to hear others and change my mind.
And i'd like to mention another thing. For me the comparison between someone not being able to play for a national team and someone not being able to be part of a society is just wrong.
Let's take the case you mentioned about a Pakistani woman. Well, i am all in favour of her having asylum, residency, right to vote, assistance, the lot. I want to help her to integrate. Not sure how to explain my thoughts about this, so bear with me.
She is coming from a terrible situation (i guess that was the underlying assumption) and we are trying to help her out.
I want to conclude using this phrase (you will see why later): we are helping her transition from a
terrible situation into a
normal situation. Her baseline is, again, terrible.
Now let's take a PI who has the skillset to become an All Black. He's got a SR contract, happy with the money and odds are he'll have something along those lines for his entire carreer. Probably move to France at some point, etc. All Blacks or no All Blacks his financial situation, unless he screws up royally, is more than ok. So in his case, his baseline is not terrible, it's actaully pretty ******* amazing. He's young, healthy, popular, a star, does what he loves and earns good money. So what i am taking from him prevents him from going from very good to outstanding one. I dont really have that in my priority list.
Recapping:
helping people to go from a terrible situation to a normal situation ---> Very important
Helping people to go from a privileged position to an even more privileged position ----> nice to have, but not a priority.
If the system i proposed above would have as a consequence that the woman couldn't move from Pakistan to NZ, I would reconsider my position. However, if my system meant that some pros couldnt make it to the national team, i'm ok with that. The benefits outweigh that cost (comfortably) in my book.
I'm not worried about you agreeing with me but i am not sure i explained myself as eloquently as i should have. Let me know if it's not clear. Again, my solution is far from perfect.