Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
Top XV of the Noughties (2001 - 2010)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nickdnz" data-source="post: 367494" data-attributes="member: 38640"><p>Larkham was good, but I'd say Carter was and is the best attacking fly half (Greater than Carlos Spencer, which is usually regarded as the best).</p><p> </p><p>[media=youtube]uxwKeQZppc0[/media]</p><p> </p><p>[media=youtube]SG476RMwsMc[/media]</p><p> </p><p>[media=youtube]9WymtGS2vsk[/media]</p><p> </p><p>He's scored more test tries than any other fly half at 29, and Stephen Larkham played 23 more tests than him. He was good, but I'd say Carter is better at attacking rugby than any other fly half, and you can see that with how well New Zealand does with and without him.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nickdnz, post: 367494, member: 38640"] Larkham was good, but I'd say Carter was and is the best attacking fly half (Greater than Carlos Spencer, which is usually regarded as the best). [media=youtube]uxwKeQZppc0[/media] [media=youtube]SG476RMwsMc[/media] [media=youtube]9WymtGS2vsk[/media] He's scored more test tries than any other fly half at 29, and Stephen Larkham played 23 more tests than him. He was good, but I'd say Carter is better at attacking rugby than any other fly half, and you can see that with how well New Zealand does with and without him. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
Top XV of the Noughties (2001 - 2010)
Top