Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Transfers rumours
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vieux Talonneur" data-source="post: 1112012" data-attributes="member: 73144"><p>Is it? </p><p></p><p>All for stability but they've all been there a very long time and there's an inevitable element of same old. </p><p></p><p>The club's in a bit of a transitional phase so you can see the attraction of continuity, but any leadership team needs gradual refreshing with new blood. In the press release Baxter acknowledges that the team hasn't performed to its potential for 18 months which would more usually have coaches looking over their shoulder than getting a new deal.</p><p></p><p>Great show of loyalty from the Chiefs but possibly misguided.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vieux Talonneur, post: 1112012, member: 73144"] Is it? All for stability but they’ve all been there a very long time and there’s an inevitable element of same old. The club’s in a bit of a transitional phase so you can see the attraction of continuity, but any leadership team needs gradual refreshing with new blood. In the press release Baxter acknowledges that the team hasn’t performed to its potential for 18 months which would more usually have coaches looking over their shoulder than getting a new deal. Great show of loyalty from the Chiefs but possibly misguided. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Transfers rumours
Top