Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Uncontested scrums - down to 13?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="paddybrown" data-source="post: 1028210" data-attributes="member: 84414"><p>Can anyone explain a very weird rule to me?</p><p></p><p>In last night's Pro14 match between Ulster and Zebre, Zebre's hooker Ceciliani had to go off early with a head injury. His replacement, Manfredi, was red carded five minutes before half time. Ceciliani wasn't able to come back on, and they didn't have anyone else who could play hooker, so they had to go to uncontested scrums. All clear so far. But the referee decided that Zebre had to take another player off, so they had to play more than half the match with 13 men. In the name of God, why?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="paddybrown, post: 1028210, member: 84414"] Can anyone explain a very weird rule to me? In last night's Pro14 match between Ulster and Zebre, Zebre's hooker Ceciliani had to go off early with a head injury. His replacement, Manfredi, was red carded five minutes before half time. Ceciliani wasn't able to come back on, and they didn't have anyone else who could play hooker, so they had to go to uncontested scrums. All clear so far. But the referee decided that Zebre had to take another player off, so they had to play more than half the match with 13 men. In the name of God, why? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Uncontested scrums - down to 13?
Top