• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

USA news & politics

He's so 'smart' that he's trying to get coke to switch to cane sugar and **** over a shitton of Midwest corn farmers that rely on high fructose corn syrup.
 
Ragey Erasmus said:
  • Thinking passing a cognitive test is the equivalent of acing an IQ test
  • Tariffs threats by letter written in the same way as his Truth social posts with errors like swapping the gender of the recipient within the same letter
  • Draining California's water reserves under the guise of firefighting when it was not used for the purpose and instead left them with much less irrigation
  • Repeatedly not knowing who was in charge of capitol security
  • General toddler-esque vocabulary
  • Slapping tariffs on the entire world, then reversing it, then reversing the reversal etc
  • All the election denial
  • Waging war with the universities through federal funding threats and threats to students
  • Taking vast quantities of the most highly classified information to Mar-A-Lago, refusing to return it and lying about the entire process
  • Repeatedly referring to Canada as the 51st state, threatening annexation of Greenland and alienating every single US ally excluding Israel
  • Withdrawing from the WHO
  • Believing Putin on anything and ambushing Zelensky
  • Attempting to end birthright citizenship via executive order
  • Pardoning the Jan 6th rioters
  • Mass firings of vital federal employees, only to have to rehire them when realising what a mistake it was
  • Calling Spain a member of the BRICS
  • ******** over the trade deal with Mexico and asking who would agree to such a thing when it was him, right after he **** over the deal before that
  • Making comments about Liz Cheney being shot
  • Not knowing Britain isn't in the EU
  • Thinking he can revoke citizenship on a whim
  • Threatening direct federal control over cities who don't elect local leaders he wants
  • Using a sharpie to extend the path of a hurricane on a map rather than admit he is wrong
  • Not knowing Puerto Ricans are American citizens.
  • Claiming multiple times his dad was born in Germany when it was actually his grandad
  • Thinking you need ID to buy basic groceries
  • Claiming windmills cause cancer (and not knowing the difference between windmill and wind turbine)
The list goes on an on. You may argue some are just gaffes but if someone has a habit of making idiotic statements and showing a serious lack of understanding about something, chances are they are just an idiot with little understanding.
Click to expand...

  • Putting MAGA lives at risk by suggesting COVID could be cured by injecting bleach.
 
dirty harry said:
Well it depends on your definition of moronic acts. He's certainly gone full tilt in term 2, and is getting through an unreal amount of work, tackling every issue head on in year 1 at 100mph.

The thing about presidenices is that its hard to judge until outcomes are evidenced. While they are in office the opposition berates them regardless of what they do, see Bidens 4 years.

Which moronic act would you elude to in particular?
Click to expand...
Is that why he hasn't had time to release the Epstein list?
 
Ragey Erasmus said:
Considering the point I'm making is that a patterns of idiotic things would indicate it's likely someone is actually an idiot, picking one would defeat the point wouldn't it? It's like asking someone to prove a trend with a single datum point.
Click to expand...

But this isn't a list of idiotic things, this is a list of thing you dont like, that you have popped into an idiotic action pot...

To designate the person as an idiot, you have to make a case for idiotic actions, someone who disagrees with you that the billionaire, well educated leader of the free world is not a low IQ moron, just doesn't accept the assertion that actions you dislike, let's say withdrawing from WHO, are moronic.

Now I could disagree that withdrawal usefull, and we could discuss the dangers and merits, but moronic?

So again, let's be specific. Pick one
 
Kiwiwomble said:
im sorry, how can you say "clearly"?....at best it murky, i think most people would reserve "clearly" for someone who hasnt even been accused.... unless you actually think there is nothing wrong with what hes said? let alone accused of doing
Click to expand...

Offender is a term used for someone who commits an illegal act. Trump was never convicted of any sexual crimes that im aware, he was civilly sued for defamation, in the run up to the 2020 election, for denying the accusations by Carroll that at some point in the 90s, he sexually assaulted her, in a shop, with no witnesses.
That was he said she said. He was later sued after a law change for the act itself, in which he paid up.

None of thisnwas criminal, therefore offender is 'clearly' the wrong word wouldnt you say?
 
dirty harry said:
But this isn't a list of idiotic things, this is a list of thing you dont like, that you have popped into an idiotic action pot...

To designate the person as an idiot, you have to make a case for idiotic actions, someone who disagrees with you that the billionaire, well educated leader of the free world is not a low IQ moron, just doesn't accept the assertion that actions you dislike, let's say withdrawing from WHO, are moronic.

Now I could disagree that withdrawal usefull, and we could discuss the dangers and merits, but moronic?

So again, let's be specific. Pick one
Click to expand...
Except it is a list of idiotic things, you merely asserting they aren't is no better than what you accuse me of.

But if you want to pick one, let's go for the one directly relating to intelligence. Trump doesn't appear to know the difference between a cognitive test for mental deterioration and an IQ test. Is this idiotic?
 
Fair play though. I respect the levels of denialism. Next time my mrs highlights the stupid **** I do I’m going to turn around to her and say “those are stupid things those are just things you don’t like”
 

dirty harry said:
Offender is a term used for someone who commits an illegal act. Trump was never convicted of any sexual crimes that im aware, he was civilly sued for defamation, in the run up to the 2020 election, for denying the accusations by Carroll that at some point in the 90s, he sexually assaulted her, in a shop, with no witnesses.
That was he said she said. He was later sued after a law change for the act itself, in which he paid up.

None of thisnwas criminal, therefore offender is 'clearly' the wrong word wouldnt you say?
Click to expand...
Jimmy Saville was never convicted of any offences either. He was a nonce as well.
 

Similar threads

Kiwiwomble
Local Club Rugby
Replies
9
Views
3K
Kiwiwomble
Kiwiwomble
Which Tyler
Proposed law changes - 2024 edition
Replies
9
Views
4K
AlRums
AlRums
4
"Ten simple and effective law changes that should be made to rugby refereeing"
2
Replies
24
Views
3K
Reiser99
R
Y
Blaming
Replies
6
Views
1K
Bruce_ma gooshvili
Bruce_ma gooshvili
Bruce_ma gooshvili
The 'problem' of Leinster 'dominance'
3 4 5
Replies
87
Views
13K
higgik
H

Latest posts

Sponsored
UnlistMe
Back
Top