Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
What's up with England's ball-carrying forwards?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crapspray" data-source="post: 695700" data-attributes="member: 58918"><p>Also, Waldrom was brought in after the Scotland game and was benched against Ireland and France, before being dropped for Croft against Italy and Wales.</p><p></p><p>Lancaster would rather play:</p><p></p><p>6. Lawes</p><p>7. Robshaw</p><p>8. Wood</p><p></p><p>19. Haskell</p><p>20. Waldrom</p><p></p><p>or</p><p></p><p>6. Croft</p><p>7. Robshaw</p><p>8. Wood</p><p></p><p>20. Haskell</p><p></p><p>than bring actual carriers into the starting pack.</p><p></p><p>As rats said, carriers and fetchers can gtfo.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crapspray, post: 695700, member: 58918"] Also, Waldrom was brought in after the Scotland game and was benched against Ireland and France, before being dropped for Croft against Italy and Wales. Lancaster would rather play: 6. Lawes 7. Robshaw 8. Wood 19. Haskell 20. Waldrom or 6. Croft 7. Robshaw 8. Wood 20. Haskell than bring actual carriers into the starting pack. As rats said, carriers and fetchers can gtfo. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
What's up with England's ball-carrying forwards?
Top