JJR
Bench Player
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2010
- Messages
- 573
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
I will first say that it will be between Sharks,Bulls,Stormers and Crusaders.
Why-
Sharks have awesome depth in each position and best squad in the tournament in my opinion in terms of quality depth. They have a good mix of youth and experience...eg.John smit and 37 year old stef terblanche, with younger stars patrick lambie and lwazi mvovo. They have the most balanced and quality pack in the comp...Springbok frontrow with another bok on the bench... and a great mix of power and pace in the back row with keegan daniel,Deysel,Alberts and kanko. Sharks have a very attcking backline to complement a very powerful forward pack...9.Mcloed 10.Lambie/JLP 11.Mvovo 12.Bosman 13.Jacobs/Stef 14.Jpp 15.Ludik...all very good attacking players. Also Sharks playing a brand from the Currie Cup that suits the new laws and plays a ball in hand approach and main focus on patience and quick ball...very similar to the All Blacks current style, but slightly more focus on creating go forward ball first.
Bulls- simple...they will also have a very strong pack and then fourie Du Preez and Morne steyn to back it up. Experienced star players Du preez,Matfield,Steyn,Spies,Botha,Steenkamp...with Rossouw, van der merwe and Gary Botha to back it up.
Stormers- Similar brand of play to THE Sharks (if grant plays 10 not de waal)...great backline, but still a question mark over their halfback pairing for me and the grunt of their tight 5. Bekker does a good job 4 them, but not sure if they will quite match up with Bulls or Sharks in tight knockout situations.
Crusaders- Always play a great balanced game with equal focus on fowards and backs...basically basic rugby at it's best. Then Carter and Ritchie...solid pack, not the strongest, but can give backs good ball and then a mean centre combo...williams and robbie.
Waratahs,Chiefs,Brumbies and canes will end up a bit short, but will perform well.
My money is on a Sharks/Bulls final...no biased involved...they have the best squads in terms of quality depth and great/experienced individuals.
Why-
Sharks have awesome depth in each position and best squad in the tournament in my opinion in terms of quality depth. They have a good mix of youth and experience...eg.John smit and 37 year old stef terblanche, with younger stars patrick lambie and lwazi mvovo. They have the most balanced and quality pack in the comp...Springbok frontrow with another bok on the bench... and a great mix of power and pace in the back row with keegan daniel,Deysel,Alberts and kanko. Sharks have a very attcking backline to complement a very powerful forward pack...9.Mcloed 10.Lambie/JLP 11.Mvovo 12.Bosman 13.Jacobs/Stef 14.Jpp 15.Ludik...all very good attacking players. Also Sharks playing a brand from the Currie Cup that suits the new laws and plays a ball in hand approach and main focus on patience and quick ball...very similar to the All Blacks current style, but slightly more focus on creating go forward ball first.
Bulls- simple...they will also have a very strong pack and then fourie Du Preez and Morne steyn to back it up. Experienced star players Du preez,Matfield,Steyn,Spies,Botha,Steenkamp...with Rossouw, van der merwe and Gary Botha to back it up.
Stormers- Similar brand of play to THE Sharks (if grant plays 10 not de waal)...great backline, but still a question mark over their halfback pairing for me and the grunt of their tight 5. Bekker does a good job 4 them, but not sure if they will quite match up with Bulls or Sharks in tight knockout situations.
Crusaders- Always play a great balanced game with equal focus on fowards and backs...basically basic rugby at it's best. Then Carter and Ritchie...solid pack, not the strongest, but can give backs good ball and then a mean centre combo...williams and robbie.
Waratahs,Chiefs,Brumbies and canes will end up a bit short, but will perform well.
My money is on a Sharks/Bulls final...no biased involved...they have the best squads in terms of quality depth and great/experienced individuals.
Last edited: