Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
World Rugby Chairman election Beaumont v Pichot.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="die_mole" data-source="post: 994310" data-attributes="member: 73648"><p>Agree with TAB that the quality of the team shouldn't matter. Should Australia be pulled from the rotation because of recent performance? </p><p></p><p>only that that matters is can the host country provide a quality tour. Right now Argentina could provide three tests and a game or two against the Jaguares, which is the same team as the pumas. Until they have enough pro teams for a 8-10 game tour they shouldn't be considered (unless they'd tour Canada, USA, Uruguay, then Argentina. Which wouldn't be the worst thing).</p><p></p><p>the best argument against Argentina in my mind is that it only comes to countries once every twelve years, pushing it to sixteen years would mean the revenue each country would get would be spread out even more. Argentina would probably be better off looking for a different source of revenue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="die_mole, post: 994310, member: 73648"] Agree with TAB that the quality of the team shouldn’t matter. Should Australia be pulled from the rotation because of recent performance? only that that matters is can the host country provide a quality tour. Right now Argentina could provide three tests and a game or two against the Jaguares, which is the same team as the pumas. Until they have enough pro teams for a 8-10 game tour they shouldn’t be considered (unless they’d tour Canada, USA, Uruguay, then Argentina. Which wouldn’t be the worst thing). the best argument against Argentina in my mind is that it only comes to countries once every twelve years, pushing it to sixteen years would mean the revenue each country would get would be spread out even more. Argentina would probably be better off looking for a different source of revenue. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
World Rugby Chairman election Beaumont v Pichot.
Top