• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

WRU portrait of the Queen

psychic duck

International
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
5,094
WTF. Why the hell have the WRU wasted money on this????????????

The regions are in big need of a boost and the WRU pay for this. Absolute waste of money. I'm sure the Queen doesn't give a ****, and it's a **** portrait anyway that is of zero use to anybody.

http://www.wru.co.uk/eng/news/26732.php#.UYJFqrWG3zk


painting1920_rdax_530x331.jpg
824BADFA798430FAF2DC29E06C9035.jpg
 
I'm with you on this PD. Obsurd. Like there aren't enough f*cking painting of the Queen out there, the WRU needs to pay for one...

If she posed in a Lions jersey, in a Johhny Wilkinson kicking pose - against Australia I'd say fair play...but this.
 
Her left hand is bloody huge! So it's also a sh*t painting.

Edit. I thought from the ***le that the WRU board members had all pitched in to paint it. Certainly what it looked like.
 
Last edited:
you might aswell of painted George north in a Northampton shirt
 
The artist explains himself ... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-22367445

More to the point though, look at this guy's work. How does he make a living as a professional? How the hell could the WRU not find a better artist? I'm sure you could find better artists at GCSE, how has worked his way up? His work is ****. Who an earth would part from their money for this crap? And what an earth does the Queen have to do with Welsh rugby and why are the WRU brown nosing the monarchy?

http://www.danllywelynhall.co.uk/people_gallery.htm
 
It's always the same with art though, the sh*t stuff is what's considered good!
 
The portrait will stand Welsh rugby in far greater stead than paying for George North, Dan Lydiate or James Hook's contract.
 

Latest posts

Top