Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
General Gaming Chat
Xbox360 or PS3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF C A Iversen" data-source="post: 357998" data-attributes="member: 12312"><p><em>Increase</em> in condescension? Not sure if you mean me, or if you mean the forum in general or the thread? That wasn't too clear sorry. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>If it's me, I've changed how I react to people on here a little lately. I'm noticing those starting arguments or running down someone else's interests, teams, nations, hobbies or stating things as fact that clearly are opinion, are not really being contested on their viewpoint. I'd like to think that the person who initiates a negativity is the one responsible for the development of the situation. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>As for that statement "Paying for online is crap". It was something I said on Page 2 of this thread and if we bring up the start of threads after they've already been there to be discussed then it can make threads very repetitious, still there's no rule against it, lol. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>I've typed a lot in this thread and tried to not run down the Xbox 360 and I'm sure what little has been said in even a somewhat negative light about the 360 is more than out-weighed by 5-10 times as much by negative comments about the PS3. This thread is about two opposing products and peoples opposing views on them, so it's bound to get a bit driven by conflict of opinion at times.</p><p></p><p>As for saying "Paying for online is crap", that doesn't actually run down the Xbox 360. The machine itself is a very fine console, if the roles were reversed you could bet anything that I'd be still saying "Paying for online is crap". Both companies were and are into this online thing for the long haul and are starting to make a huge amount out of downloads from their respective online stores, but that isn't enough and with "Playstation Plus" Sony are starting to try and find ways to dip into the pockets too. I haven't bought into that, because I just don't myself like paying for an online service that your paying for no matter how often you use it. That goes for both consoles.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF C A Iversen, post: 357998, member: 12312"] [I]Increase[/I] in condescension? Not sure if you mean me, or if you mean the forum in general or the thread? That wasn't too clear sorry. :) If it's me, I've changed how I react to people on here a little lately. I'm noticing those starting arguments or running down someone else's interests, teams, nations, hobbies or stating things as fact that clearly are opinion, are not really being contested on their viewpoint. I'd like to think that the person who initiates a negativity is the one responsible for the development of the situation. :) As for that statement "Paying for online is crap". It was something I said on Page 2 of this thread and if we bring up the start of threads after they've already been there to be discussed then it can make threads very repetitious, still there's no rule against it, lol. :D I've typed a lot in this thread and tried to not run down the Xbox 360 and I'm sure what little has been said in even a somewhat negative light about the 360 is more than out-weighed by 5-10 times as much by negative comments about the PS3. This thread is about two opposing products and peoples opposing views on them, so it's bound to get a bit driven by conflict of opinion at times. As for saying "Paying for online is crap", that doesn't actually run down the Xbox 360. The machine itself is a very fine console, if the roles were reversed you could bet anything that I'd be still saying "Paying for online is crap". Both companies were and are into this online thing for the long haul and are starting to make a huge amount out of downloads from their respective online stores, but that isn't enough and with "Playstation Plus" Sony are starting to try and find ways to dip into the pockets too. I haven't bought into that, because I just don't myself like paying for an online service that your paying for no matter how often you use it. That goes for both consoles. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
General Gaming Chat
Xbox360 or PS3
Top