- Joined
- Dec 22, 2014
- Messages
- 4,639
- Reaction score
- 2,500
I was very young at the time so no recollection unfortunately.
Dan Luger, 16th man ring any bells? Although probably not technically a substitution as we didn’t bother taking off anyone.
I was very young at the time so no recollection unfortunately.
Dan Luger, 16th man ring any bells? Although probably not technically a substitution as we didn’t bother taking off anyone.
Well that would hand Bristol 5 points
Ah yes, correct
Not really - that's been the case for most of this seasonTurned a whole heap of games pointless now
Not really - that's been the case for most of this season
He even stated he was injured and if he had to return then the risk would be on the referee!!!I have a bridge to sell you.
Afoa was "tactical" until the point Lam required him "injured", then he was "injured" until it dawned on Lam that they'd be playing with 13 at which point the safety of Afoa became moot and he allowed the player to return.
I'll give Lam credit for his post-hoc rationalisation of the situation. But he straight up lied and threatened Ian Tempest. If Afoa's safety was ever a real concern Lam should have denied him the ability to return to the fray which he singularly failed to do. He then effectively passes his duty of care to John Afoa who he said made his own decision....
They should get the same amount of points sarries got when thier opponents covid cancelled 0Well that would hand Bristol 5 points
Erm no.They should get the same amount of points sarries got when thier opponents covid cancelled 0
No, Sarries should get the same as all the other games (4-2 split)They should get the same amount of points sarries got when thier opponents covid cancelled 0
Sam Hill onto the bench for Sale,
Rohan's Mrs has gone into labour so he's bombing it back up the motorway
Akker's latest kid was born in the UK as wellfuture England centre incoming?