Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
A Political Thread pt. 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ragey Erasmus" data-source="post: 1038443" data-attributes="member: 56232"><p>So we should pander to the nutjobs to deal with a problem that is purely a figment of their imagination whilst ignoring the sane people who are saying that the action to appeal to the nutjobs will create real problems? Sorry but in what way is that the reasonable course to follow? These people believe there is fraud despite a complete lack of evidence, you think they will stop believing there is fraud regardless of what anyone does? Of course not. You could have retina scans, fingerprints, voice matching etc and all it would take is an orange faced tosser standing up and calling the whole thing rigged for them to start screeching fraud again, so why concede to them at all? Their view is already completely separated from reality so no change to reality is going to make a dent in it. It's them who need to change, not everything else.</p><p></p><p>You're basing your support for it on a conspiracy so yeah...</p><p></p><p>Enacting voter fraud systems when there is no fraud does not increase confidence and integrity, it undermines it. You take a system that has no problems, claim it has problems and then claiming you are fixing it. That does not inspire confidence at all. Would you feel confident if you were on a boat and someone started hammering planks on to the bottom and they were telling you they were fixing leaks, even if you couldn't see them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ragey Erasmus, post: 1038443, member: 56232"] So we should pander to the nutjobs to deal with a problem that is purely a figment of their imagination whilst ignoring the sane people who are saying that the action to appeal to the nutjobs will create real problems? Sorry but in what way is that the reasonable course to follow? These people believe there is fraud despite a complete lack of evidence, you think they will stop believing there is fraud regardless of what anyone does? Of course not. You could have retina scans, fingerprints, voice matching etc and all it would take is an orange faced tosser standing up and calling the whole thing rigged for them to start screeching fraud again, so why concede to them at all? Their view is already completely separated from reality so no change to reality is going to make a dent in it. It's them who need to change, not everything else. You're basing your support for it on a conspiracy so yeah... Enacting voter fraud systems when there is no fraud does not increase confidence and integrity, it undermines it. You take a system that has no problems, claim it has problems and then claiming you are fixing it. That does not inspire confidence at all. Would you feel confident if you were on a boat and someone started hammering planks on to the bottom and they were telling you they were fixing leaks, even if you couldn't see them? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
A Political Thread pt. 2
Top