Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
A Political Thread pt. 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Booboobang" data-source="post: 1111701" data-attributes="member: 86230"><p>This isn't appeasement, it would be appeasement if the west did literally nothing, they have supplied an ungodly amount of weapons to Ukraine. You are also trying to draw conclusions from a pre nucleur weapon world wich just isnt relevent in the modern day. You're also attempting to compare Russia to Nazi Germany, which dominated everyone; they went up against everyone and thus couldn't be stopped; Russia failed at the first hurdle and couldn't even roll over Ukraine, so it's unlikely they'll try again, especially when their forces have been decimated against a non-NATO country, let alone their NATO member neighbors. Come on, use some logic here and realize it's not at all comparable, or are you attempting to portray Russia as a powerful force while also claiming they are weak, have almost no manpower, can't do anything in terms of nuclear weapons, and have completely embarrassed themselves in Russia? What troops will be used in the next escalation? If they can't knock over ukraine who is it they are going after next? What Nato member are they going to hit to deal with the US? Its a non-entity, a fiction, to assume they even have the resources or ability to escalate again against any developed nation. </p><p></p><p>It would be appeasement if you just let Russia set the demands, that wasnt mentioned, simply that the west will go for a diplomatic solution rather than let nukes fly, wich would inturn lead to the end of civilisation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Booboobang, post: 1111701, member: 86230"] This isn't appeasement, it would be appeasement if the west did literally nothing, they have supplied an ungodly amount of weapons to Ukraine. You are also trying to draw conclusions from a pre nucleur weapon world wich just isnt relevent in the modern day. You're also attempting to compare Russia to Nazi Germany, which dominated everyone; they went up against everyone and thus couldn't be stopped; Russia failed at the first hurdle and couldn't even roll over Ukraine, so it's unlikely they'll try again, especially when their forces have been decimated against a non-NATO country, let alone their NATO member neighbors. Come on, use some logic here and realize it's not at all comparable, or are you attempting to portray Russia as a powerful force while also claiming they are weak, have almost no manpower, can't do anything in terms of nuclear weapons, and have completely embarrassed themselves in Russia? What troops will be used in the next escalation? If they can't knock over ukraine who is it they are going after next? What Nato member are they going to hit to deal with the US? Its a non-entity, a fiction, to assume they even have the resources or ability to escalate again against any developed nation. It would be appeasement if you just let Russia set the demands, that wasnt mentioned, simply that the west will go for a diplomatic solution rather than let nukes fly, wich would inturn lead to the end of civilisation. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
A Political Thread pt. 2
Top