Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
Australia vs England - 3 Tests - June 2016
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="j&#039;nuh" data-source="post: 802650" data-attributes="member: 55446"><p>Second test IMO:</p><p></p><p>1. Mako</p><p>2. Hartley</p><p>3. Cole</p><p>4. Launchbury</p><p>5. Itoje</p><p>6. Robshaw</p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">7. <span style="font-size: 10px">*cough*</span>Haskell</span></p><p>8. Vunipola</p><p>9. Youngs</p><p>10. Ford</p><p>12. Farrell</p><p>13. Joseph</p><p>14. Yarde</p><p>11/15. Watson/Nowell</p><p></p><p>16. George</p><p>17. Mullan</p><p>18. Hill</p><p>19. Kruis</p><p>20. Clifford</p><p>21. Care</p><p>22. Te'o</p><p>23. Brown</p><p></p><p>I think giving both Launchbury and Kruis one game alongside Itoje is a good idea, best performer winning a place in the third test. Also would be happy with Launchbury at 6. (Not Itoje, I don't want Itoje doing anything different to what he currently is.)</p><p></p><p>Ford-Farrell is the safe option, and perhaps our best atm, as much as that is hard to admit. Te'o to come on at 12 mid-late in the game, or earlier if things aren't working, to make a case for the third test.</p><p></p><p>Still don't agree with Haskell, one swallow n all. But he's earned the right to another game.</p><p></p><p>LCD's throwing is still bad. Always should have been George on the bench.</p><p></p><p>Nowell or Watson at fullback? I'd edge Nowell, but happy with either tbh. Brown has to be on the bench if it goes wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="j'nuh, post: 802650, member: 55446"] Second test IMO: 1. Mako 2. Hartley 3. Cole 4. Launchbury 5. Itoje 6. Robshaw [SIZE=1]7. [SIZE=2]*cough*[/SIZE]Haskell[/SIZE] 8. Vunipola 9. Youngs 10. Ford 12. Farrell 13. Joseph 14. Yarde 11/15. Watson/Nowell 16. George 17. Mullan 18. Hill 19. Kruis 20. Clifford 21. Care 22. Te'o 23. Brown I think giving both Launchbury and Kruis one game alongside Itoje is a good idea, best performer winning a place in the third test. Also would be happy with Launchbury at 6. (Not Itoje, I don't want Itoje doing anything different to what he currently is.) Ford-Farrell is the safe option, and perhaps our best atm, as much as that is hard to admit. Te'o to come on at 12 mid-late in the game, or earlier if things aren't working, to make a case for the third test. Still don't agree with Haskell, one swallow n all. But he's earned the right to another game. LCD's throwing is still bad. Always should have been George on the bench. Nowell or Watson at fullback? I'd edge Nowell, but happy with either tbh. Brown has to be on the bench if it goes wrong. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
Australia vs England - 3 Tests - June 2016
Top