Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Bath - we're screwed, right?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pieter Steph du Teague" data-source="post: 810295" data-attributes="member: 72520"><p>Moving Watson to wing may be more to accommodate shifting Banahan to 12 rather than Homer to 15. I'm sure I've seen him in an England 12 shirt before, although it may have been an uncapped game. </p><p></p><p>With the players they have ATM I see the backline either being:</p><p>9. Fotuali'i</p><p>10. Ford</p><p>11. Watson</p><p>12. Banahan</p><p>13. JJ</p><p>14. Roko</p><p>15. Homer</p><p></p><p>or</p><p></p><p>9. Fotuali'i</p><p>10. Ford</p><p>11. Banahan</p><p>12. Priestland</p><p>13. JJ</p><p>14. Roko</p><p>15. Watson</p><p></p><p>To me, the first one looks much stronger.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pieter Steph du Teague, post: 810295, member: 72520"] Moving Watson to wing may be more to accommodate shifting Banahan to 12 rather than Homer to 15. I'm sure I've seen him in an England 12 shirt before, although it may have been an uncapped game. With the players they have ATM I see the backline either being: 9. Fotuali'i 10. Ford 11. Watson 12. Banahan 13. JJ 14. Roko 15. Homer or 9. Fotuali'i 10. Ford 11. Banahan 12. Priestland 13. JJ 14. Roko 15. Watson To me, the first one looks much stronger. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Bath - we're screwed, right?
Top