Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
[Bledisloe 3] Australia v New Zealand in Brisbane 18/10/14
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaguares" data-source="post: 680318" data-attributes="member: 63264"><p>Ok, but that is also merit of the opponent. When ABs play well: They are the best in the world. When ABs plays bad, they used the wrong game plan. No, if ABs were overcome in the territory and meters, was because Wobbs did merit to achieve that. </p><p></p><p>That doesn't mean that some impact players can make the difference in the second half as Sam Cane that was vital to the NZ victory, but shouldn't be removed merit Aussies saying that ABs used a bad strategy, Wallabies were superior and ABs won thanks to their bench: Sam Cane and Colin Slade.</p><p></p><p>The match was defined by small individual errors, Foley missed a very important tackle (on Fekitoa), Sam Cane obtained possession for ABs in an important moment and Colin Slade made a difficult kick. If Slade failed the last kick, we are talking about the wonderful Wallabies victory, with Carlos Spencer or even with Barrett that could have happened.</p><p></p><p>The errors don't come alone, errors appear because you have an opponent front of you that smothers you, will not let you breathe, that doesn't leave you thinking. That's what Wallabies did and why ABs committed many errors, it wasn't the Holy Spirit or something like that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaguares, post: 680318, member: 63264"] Ok, but that is also merit of the opponent. When ABs play well: They are the best in the world. When ABs plays bad, they used the wrong game plan. No, if ABs were overcome in the territory and meters, was because Wobbs did merit to achieve that. That doesn't mean that some impact players can make the difference in the second half as Sam Cane that was vital to the NZ victory, but shouldn't be removed merit Aussies saying that ABs used a bad strategy, Wallabies were superior and ABs won thanks to their bench: Sam Cane and Colin Slade. The match was defined by small individual errors, Foley missed a very important tackle (on Fekitoa), Sam Cane obtained possession for ABs in an important moment and Colin Slade made a difficult kick. If Slade failed the last kick, we are talking about the wonderful Wallabies victory, with Carlos Spencer or even with Barrett that could have happened. The errors don't come alone, errors appear because you have an opponent front of you that smothers you, will not let you breathe, that doesn't leave you thinking. That's what Wallabies did and why ABs committed many errors, it wasn't the Holy Spirit or something like that. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
[Bledisloe 3] Australia v New Zealand in Brisbane 18/10/14
Top