Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
[COVID-19] General Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Which Tyler" data-source="post: 1071893" data-attributes="member: 73592"><p>If you think that, then you're missing our point, which is that vaccination status is just one in a long line of factors, very few of which are likely to have more impact.</p><p></p><p>Again - what's your preferred, morally acceptable outcome? Because so far, all you've got, is that a person with a higher chance of survival dies instead / as well as the person with a lower chance of survival.</p><p></p><p>Other things being equal, not vaxxed = less likely to survive.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Please remember, (though I'm not sure you've even acknowledged this yet) it's a zero sum game. There's 1 heart involved here, multiple patients who've been refused it, and 1 patient who's received it.</p><p>You think it should have gone to the unvaccinated patient. The doctors with their actual knowledge of the suitability of all the patients, disagree with you.</p><p>The heart in question has not been thrown in the bin. It's been out in the chest of someone else. Someone with a better chance of surviving than the person you think should have had it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not always, no. But it 100% is in this case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Which Tyler, post: 1071893, member: 73592"] If you think that, then you're missing our point, which is that vaccination status is just one in a long line of factors, very few of which are likely to have more impact. Again - what's your preferred, morally acceptable outcome? Because so far, all you've got, is that a person with a higher chance of survival dies instead / as well as the person with a lower chance of survival. Other things being equal, not vaxxed = less likely to survive. Please remember, (though I'm not sure you've even acknowledged this yet) it's a zero sum game. There's 1 heart involved here, multiple patients who've been refused it, and 1 patient who's received it. You think it should have gone to the unvaccinated patient. The doctors with their actual knowledge of the suitability of all the patients, disagree with you. The heart in question has not been thrown in the bin. It's been out in the chest of someone else. Someone with a better chance of surviving than the person you think should have had it. Not always, no. But it 100% is in this case. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
[COVID-19] General Discussion
Top