Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
[COVID-19] General Discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Amiga500" data-source="post: 1132546" data-attributes="member: 56767"><p>Completely disagree.</p><p></p><p>If this were, say, an air disaster - the whole lot would be under the microscope, from the pilots who were flying to the guy who refuelled it to the folks who last did maintenance work.</p><p></p><p>Its not necessarily the intelligence or the integrity of any scientist that is in question, while that'll always be a subject that rears its head, its really whether the scientific opinion presented contained representative input <em>and review</em> of suitably qualified and experienced people across the board.</p><p> </p><p>Robust review being absolutely critical. An echo chamber serves no-one.</p><p></p><p>We already <em>know </em>there was a serious neglect in onboarding of lessons from Asia in previous airborne viruses, we already know there was a dithering from SAGE early on and only when the horse bolted did they start to shut the door with regards social distancing (remember Cheltenham anyone?).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Amiga500, post: 1132546, member: 56767"] Completely disagree. If this were, say, an air disaster - the whole lot would be under the microscope, from the pilots who were flying to the guy who refuelled it to the folks who last did maintenance work. Its not necessarily the intelligence or the integrity of any scientist that is in question, while that'll always be a subject that rears its head, its really whether the scientific opinion presented contained representative input [I]and review[/I] of suitably qualified and experienced people across the board. Robust review being absolutely critical. An echo chamber serves no-one. We already [I]know [/I]there was a serious neglect in onboarding of lessons from Asia in previous airborne viruses, we already know there was a dithering from SAGE early on and only when the horse bolted did they start to shut the door with regards social distancing (remember Cheltenham anyone?). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
[COVID-19] General Discussion
Top