Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
All Other Sports
Cricket Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ncurd" data-source="post: 949680" data-attributes="member: 72205"><p>Why shouldn't the fielding team be penalised for throwing the ball at the batsman that has not changed his line or direction?</p><p></p><p>To me I'd like to see the law put in place that hitting a batsman or any equipment they is currently carrying/wearing provided they did not change line of direction is awarded 1 run, all completed runs and if both batsman were out their crease and travelling towards completing an additional run that run as well. The ball is also declared dead at point of impact with the player.</p><p></p><p>I agree the 4 runs for the boundary was unfair (but within the laws) but the fielding side should still be penalised for throwing the ball at an opposing player (I accept this was not intentional). I also think the rule about crossing is ********, Stokes/Wood completed that run and they should have taken of when the fielder released the ball? that's also nonsence even if it is in the game what should of happened.</p><p></p><p>Under this England would of been awarded 3 runs instead 6 they did or the 5 they should have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ncurd, post: 949680, member: 72205"] Why shouldn't the fielding team be penalised for throwing the ball at the batsman that has not changed his line or direction? To me I'd like to see the law put in place that hitting a batsman or any equipment they is currently carrying/wearing provided they did not change line of direction is awarded 1 run, all completed runs and if both batsman were out their crease and travelling towards completing an additional run that run as well. The ball is also declared dead at point of impact with the player. I agree the 4 runs for the boundary was unfair (but within the laws) but the fielding side should still be penalised for throwing the ball at an opposing player (I accept this was not intentional). I also think the rule about crossing is ********, Stokes/Wood completed that run and they should have taken of when the fielder released the ball? that's also nonsence even if it is in the game what should of happened. Under this England would of been awarded 3 runs instead 6 they did or the 5 they should have. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
All Other Sports
Cricket Thread
Top