Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
Empire's 500 Greatest Movies of All Time.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dullonien" data-source="post: 308947"><p>I agree with alot you have said nickdnz. I'm not a fan of old films in general, I find the acting (especially accents) poor, whilst the scrips can be a little boring. I know that's something very personal, so I won't comment on their inclusion in this list.</p><p> </p><p>There was alot of dross included in this list, some of which you have mentioned above. I can understand the inclusion of the first Spiderman for example, as it kick started the comic book genre, but there was no need to also include Spiderman 2! I personally loved 300, so agree with it's inclusion (would have had it higher), the stylized nature of it was pure awesome imo. No idea how Forrest Gump wasn't alot higher, and they obviously loved the Bourne trillogy, to have all three in the list (I think), yet only have two Bond films!</p><p> </p><p>I still can't believe that 'Lock Stock' didn't make the list, although grad that 'Layer Cake' did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dullonien, post: 308947"] I agree with alot you have said nickdnz. I'm not a fan of old films in general, I find the acting (especially accents) poor, whilst the scrips can be a little boring. I know that's something very personal, so I won't comment on their inclusion in this list. There was alot of dross included in this list, some of which you have mentioned above. I can understand the inclusion of the first Spiderman for example, as it kick started the comic book genre, but there was no need to also include Spiderman 2! I personally loved 300, so agree with it's inclusion (would have had it higher), the stylized nature of it was pure awesome imo. No idea how Forrest Gump wasn't alot higher, and they obviously loved the Bourne trillogy, to have all three in the list (I think), yet only have two Bond films! I still can't believe that 'Lock Stock' didn't make the list, although grad that 'Layer Cake' did. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
Empire's 500 Greatest Movies of All Time.
Top