Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
EOYT: Wales vs New Zealand, 24/11/2012
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TRF C A Iversen" data-source="post: 540561" data-attributes="member: 12312"><p>Stop trying to tell us what we mean. Everyone's individual view is their own and you are not the world's authority on what's right or wrong and neither am I. Where were you in the threads relating to Scott Higginbotham and his headbutt? Not as prevalent as you are here that's for sure if you were there at all. Get your own Wallaby hat off before telling us to take off our black caps.</p><p></p><p>Also, how DARE YOU belittle RAPE by using it in an example of that kind above. Even though you are stating that a victim doesn't deserve an attack (which is true) you should never compare a rugby situation in even the remotest comparison to rape. Your post should be deleted. You ever done anything wrong? I think think you bloody well have here mate and maybe YOU should for once admit you've made a mistake. That was straight out bang out of order. Use sports comparisons or argument comparisons, not sexual assaults.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Back to what should be discussed! Throwing buts into an argument in the case kiwi's have used it here is as a reference to the past and the future of citing incidents and rugby attacks and DOES carry relevance. The panels reviewing citings and penalties in rugby do indeed take the past examples and the future into the equation. Incidents on a rugby field are after all comparable in degrees of intensity and effect. (A HELL of a lot better idea than what you used as a comparison above!!!). Why shouldn't we also be able to compare the past and future examples of misconduct when more sensible authorities than yourself use them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TRF C A Iversen, post: 540561, member: 12312"] Stop trying to tell us what we mean. Everyone's individual view is their own and you are not the world's authority on what's right or wrong and neither am I. Where were you in the threads relating to Scott Higginbotham and his headbutt? Not as prevalent as you are here that's for sure if you were there at all. Get your own Wallaby hat off before telling us to take off our black caps. Also, how DARE YOU belittle RAPE by using it in an example of that kind above. Even though you are stating that a victim doesn't deserve an attack (which is true) you should never compare a rugby situation in even the remotest comparison to rape. Your post should be deleted. You ever done anything wrong? I think think you bloody well have here mate and maybe YOU should for once admit you've made a mistake. That was straight out bang out of order. Use sports comparisons or argument comparisons, not sexual assaults. Back to what should be discussed! Throwing buts into an argument in the case kiwi's have used it here is as a reference to the past and the future of citing incidents and rugby attacks and DOES carry relevance. The panels reviewing citings and penalties in rugby do indeed take the past examples and the future into the equation. Incidents on a rugby field are after all comparable in degrees of intensity and effect. (A HELL of a lot better idea than what you used as a comparison above!!!). Why shouldn't we also be able to compare the past and future examples of misconduct when more sensible authorities than yourself use them? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
EOYT: Wales vs New Zealand, 24/11/2012
Top