Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
George Smith v Phil Waugh
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fushitsusha" data-source="post: 203655"><p>Why? Because he's giving Phil Waugh a run this week?</p><p></p><p>I think it was always known that Waugh would get a starting chance at some stage before the Tri Nations begin.</p><p></p><p>However, if Deans has any sense he'll NEED to start with Smith against New Zealand and South Africa. You can't go with second choice players against those kinds of teams. And Smith has a good history of upsetting New Zealand teams. [/b]</p></blockquote><p>You know I don't necessarily think that he needs to start Smith to be honest. In fact I think there's a fair argument that it might be smarter to start Waugh. Waugh is a workhorse, and he's good for stabilising the team and adding that extra bit of venom in defence, whereas Smith is a more dynamic/attacking player that will be more likely to put the wallabies in a positive position. That being the case I think that there's actually a lot to be said for bringing Smith on half way through when Waugh has done the ground work and the opposition teams are running out of puff. Of course, as we saw against the Irish bringing Waugh on late can be just as effective with his aggressive defence that can really rattle attacking teams (esp when they're knackered).</p><p>[/b][/quote]</p><p></p><p>My opinion is that Waugh is best utilised coming on in the second half, and I feel he's played his best for the Wallabies as an impact player. For me he's always been average at best when starting for the Wallabies, and you can't waste Smith's talents by bringing him on late in the game. It would be like starting with Masoe and bringing on McCaw for 20mins.</p><p></p><p>George Smith is needed for the full match because (as statistics show) he is going to create more turnovers, more tackles, more line-breaks, more metres, more offloads in the tackle, and more attacking opportunities for his team.</p><p></p><p>I also think Deans might also have to start seriously thinking about omitting Waugh from the 22 altogether and bringing someone like Hoiles onto the bench who has such mobility and can cover the entire backrow.</p><p></p><p>PS I'm sick of all the NSW rhetoric that Waugh is 'hard on the ball'. It seems to be the only argument for him to be in the starting XV. That's great, but he's still not the best player in his position. I'd rather go for the player that creates more turnovers, makes more metres, tackles and has all-round better ball skills.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Fushitsusha, post: 203655"] Why? Because he's giving Phil Waugh a run this week? I think it was always known that Waugh would get a starting chance at some stage before the Tri Nations begin. However, if Deans has any sense he'll NEED to start with Smith against New Zealand and South Africa. You can't go with second choice players against those kinds of teams. And Smith has a good history of upsetting New Zealand teams. [/b][/quote] You know I don't necessarily think that he needs to start Smith to be honest. In fact I think there's a fair argument that it might be smarter to start Waugh. Waugh is a workhorse, and he's good for stabilising the team and adding that extra bit of venom in defence, whereas Smith is a more dynamic/attacking player that will be more likely to put the wallabies in a positive position. That being the case I think that there's actually a lot to be said for bringing Smith on half way through when Waugh has done the ground work and the opposition teams are running out of puff. Of course, as we saw against the Irish bringing Waugh on late can be just as effective with his aggressive defence that can really rattle attacking teams (esp when they're knackered). [/b][/quote] My opinion is that Waugh is best utilised coming on in the second half, and I feel he's played his best for the Wallabies as an impact player. For me he's always been average at best when starting for the Wallabies, and you can't waste Smith's talents by bringing him on late in the game. It would be like starting with Masoe and bringing on McCaw for 20mins. George Smith is needed for the full match because (as statistics show) he is going to create more turnovers, more tackles, more line-breaks, more metres, more offloads in the tackle, and more attacking opportunities for his team. I also think Deans might also have to start seriously thinking about omitting Waugh from the 22 altogether and bringing someone like Hoiles onto the bench who has such mobility and can cover the entire backrow. PS I'm sick of all the NSW rhetoric that Waugh is 'hard on the ball'. It seems to be the only argument for him to be in the starting XV. That's great, but he's still not the best player in his position. I'd rather go for the player that creates more turnovers, makes more metres, tackles and has all-round better ball skills. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
George Smith v Phil Waugh
Top