Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
He's gone. He's actually bloody gone!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raz" data-source="post: 771145" data-attributes="member: 73368"><p>Most concerned about the fact that Farrell appears to still in place. Also Catt and Rowntree, although not to the same extent.</p><p></p><p>Does it worry anyone else that Lancaster appears to have been sacked with no coherent plan on his successor? My argument before the review was that Lanxaster should go but o lay if there is a clear plan as to the individual(s) taking over his role.</p><p></p><p>If Farrell stays then it would appear SL took all of the blame which leaves Farrell in place, something that I can only see as a negative.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raz, post: 771145, member: 73368"] Most concerned about the fact that Farrell appears to still in place. Also Catt and Rowntree, although not to the same extent. Does it worry anyone else that Lancaster appears to have been sacked with no coherent plan on his successor? My argument before the review was that Lanxaster should go but o lay if there is a clear plan as to the individual(s) taking over his role. If Farrell stays then it would appear SL took all of the blame which leaves Farrell in place, something that I can only see as a negative. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
International Test Matches
He's gone. He's actually bloody gone!
Top