Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
All Other Sports
NCAA Football 2006 season
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fcukernaut" data-source="post: 82819"><p>I'm watching, but i'm not seeing anything spectacular. All i see is just a decent runner. He's not bad nor is he great. He definitly doesn't go in the top echelon of runningbacks in the ncaa. The list would be something like this:</p><p></p><p><u>Creme of the Crop</u></p><p>Adrian Peterson</p><p>Marshawn Lynch</p><p>Micheal Bush(if he were healthy)</p><p></p><p><u>In between the creme and second tier</u></p><p>Kenny Irons</p><p></p><p><u>Second Tier</u></p><p>Mike Hart</p><p>Steve Slaton</p><p></p><p><u>Third Tier</u></p><p>Antonio Pittman</p><p>Darius Walker</p><p>Garret Wolfe</p><p></p><p></p><p>I also like two other guys Ray Rice who plays for Rutgers and Ian Johnson who plays for Boise st. These two guys have impressed me big time. However there is no room for them on the board. </p><p></p><p>I'm even tempted to move Wolfe into the second tier simply based on what he did against OSU. The only thing is that was the only game i've seen of him so i don't want that to cloud my judgement. I know you're going to say something about Hart but thats just because he plays for michigan and you're a biased buckeye fan. Slaton has proved a fair bit and i've seen enough of him to like what he has, however that could change at any point. Kenny Irons is a beast and is anchoring that Auburn team, he's a huge reason for thier success. And Lynch and Peterson are no brainers.</p><p></p><p>BTW is Antonio Pittman related to the one that plays for the bucs?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well i wouldn't consider Smith a legend quite yet. Archie Griffin is a legend. Smith is just a very good player and depending how this year goes should determine how he's viewed in a historical context.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fcukernaut, post: 82819"] I'm watching, but i'm not seeing anything spectacular. All i see is just a decent runner. He's not bad nor is he great. He definitly doesn't go in the top echelon of runningbacks in the ncaa. The list would be something like this: [u]Creme of the Crop[/u] Adrian Peterson Marshawn Lynch Micheal Bush(if he were healthy) [u]In between the creme and second tier[/u] Kenny Irons [u]Second Tier[/u] Mike Hart Steve Slaton [u]Third Tier[/u] Antonio Pittman Darius Walker Garret Wolfe I also like two other guys Ray Rice who plays for Rutgers and Ian Johnson who plays for Boise st. These two guys have impressed me big time. However there is no room for them on the board. I'm even tempted to move Wolfe into the second tier simply based on what he did against OSU. The only thing is that was the only game i've seen of him so i don't want that to cloud my judgement. I know you're going to say something about Hart but thats just because he plays for michigan and you're a biased buckeye fan. Slaton has proved a fair bit and i've seen enough of him to like what he has, however that could change at any point. Kenny Irons is a beast and is anchoring that Auburn team, he's a huge reason for thier success. And Lynch and Peterson are no brainers. BTW is Antonio Pittman related to the one that plays for the bucs? Well i wouldn't consider Smith a legend quite yet. Archie Griffin is a legend. Smith is just a very good player and depending how this year goes should determine how he's viewed in a historical context. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
All Other Sports
NCAA Football 2006 season
Top