Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
New laws
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ospervat" data-source="post: 867011" data-attributes="member: 72942"><p>Interesting.</p><p></p><p>Scrums</p><p>It remains to be seen whether refs strictly police the straight feed - the law has always stipulated straight feed but refs just seemed to let skew feeds go on. Time will tell.</p><p>I'm definitely in favour of at least one strike as compulsory - need to get some old fashioned skills re-introduced. Just hope 9 doesn't continue with skew feeds and the front row just hooks for appearances sake.</p><p>Not sure that I agree with 9 standing up to shoulder width on his side of scrum. I can see how that might encourage straighter feeds but the advantage is overwhelming - not sure that it really is a fair contest for possession. It's like saying the throw in at the line-out can be over your line as long as it's straight!</p><p></p><p>Rucks</p><p>Definitely in favour of new law on definition of a ruck. Don't want to see the farce we saw in 6N Eng v Italy again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ospervat, post: 867011, member: 72942"] Interesting. Scrums It remains to be seen whether refs strictly police the straight feed - the law has always stipulated straight feed but refs just seemed to let skew feeds go on. Time will tell. I'm definitely in favour of at least one strike as compulsory - need to get some old fashioned skills re-introduced. Just hope 9 doesn't continue with skew feeds and the front row just hooks for appearances sake. Not sure that I agree with 9 standing up to shoulder width on his side of scrum. I can see how that might encourage straighter feeds but the advantage is overwhelming - not sure that it really is a fair contest for possession. It's like saying the throw in at the line-out can be over your line as long as it's straight! Rucks Definitely in favour of new law on definition of a ruck. Don't want to see the farce we saw in 6N Eng v Italy again. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
New laws
Top