Discussion in 'European Champions & Challenge Cup' started by Tigs Man, Oct 13, 2016.
You've an amazing ability to completely head **** people munstermuffin. You win.
Is that simply you can't answer. I just asked simple question
Got me here, first time I've misread you in a while despite your beliefs...
- - - Updated - - -
Not that I think your comment had anything to do with my Racing one mind.
Ok Alpha again seen as any time I've offered before. Prove me wrong. Please. Please don't just ignore and walk away like before just answer please.
And I replied directly to your Racing comment.
This was my comment:
Man I'll admit Racing may be a gimme but that was poor. Castres had poor team out and Leinster made awful hard work. Racing were a gimme but so should've this be.
Also I don't think Munster will get BP tomorrow.
Guess that the difference. We ain't cocky or confident enough to expect.
Whereas you practically were guaranteing ye would be 1 seed.
Which was in reply to this.
The part I took issue with being part of a new paragraph.
Aaaaand upon further inspection the first mention of Munster in this thread today is this rather snide and petty comment...
I'd all but conceded had ya left me alone too!
Yes in reference to a comment elsewhere where you predicted Leinster would beat Wasps in a slSF after they beat Munster. Just that Munster were mentioned as part of your prediction was coincidence.
So I beg you please prove me wrong.
The fact is you always seem to run so please provide the solid evidence?
Just did bro, you mentioned Munster first! You can't be moving goalposts!
In the context did I not refer back to when you mentioned first so try again. Come on your usually more swag and cocky.
This is your original comment that I was on about Alpha. So I guess agaon you probably won't reply. Pity as I said you seem to pick fight for nothing
Munstermuffen v The Alpha Bro, no. 1372 [Petty Arguments Court]
Issue; Who mentioned Munster first?
Beginning of argument bolded here
First instance of Munster being brought up here
Plaintiff claims that argument was brought up in context to Defendant's Racing comment, this is not clear in beginning of the argument (The Plaintiff does write 'as I said' while bringing this up, for the first time, but that is not the case)
Court Rules; Defendant is correct, sexy and has great hair, orders him to leave this argument and advises him to take a dump and watch New Girl. Plaintiff is wrong as there is no proof of context other than his own word after the fact, he is advised to
YAAAAASS I've missed Judge Judy
So who's going to flip the monopoly board off the table, eat the top hat piece and then smear their **** on the wall first? Stay tuned to find out.
Again Alpha can't admit and just runs off subject.
And again I know your a pro s misreading and as I've heard from others bullying off site. I think I did use your words not mine for original quote. So again maybe work on fact not what you want.
That was on subject and as clear as day. I haven't bent the truth or used false information whatsoever, time to admit you're wrong lad.
As for bullying, that's a pretty harmful and baseless allegation to make, take that to private messages if you want to continue there.
As I said I'll simply leave it at that if you think your right fair enough.
And no I'd rather keep all my comments on public. And I wouldn't say its baseless and I'm not alone.
But look I'll leave it at that sick.of arguing
You never said that...
If you feel bullied take it up with a mod or with me in private, you have no right to post anything like that publically on here.
Actually it's a forum so I can post what I feel. And look if you don't feel like your a bully then don't worry.
Just someone other than me thinks different. We will leave it there. As I've said in past I don't hold grudges just opinions are opinions.
Two little boys had two little toys,Opps not politically correct.
Separate names with a comma.