Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Premiership Rugby 22/23 - Rd 13
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rinkadink" data-source="post: 1114049" data-attributes="member: 74190"><p>Yann Thomas looks pretty unimpressed also.</p><p></p><p>I haven't seen any credible reports from members of the public hearing what was initially said by Marler. A publication put forward a different name than a "yo momma" jibe, but perhaps its best if we stop digging as everything important is out there. On the face of it this isn't your normal sledge and handbags, you can tell by the reaction of multiple people. You can tell by the media. You can tell by the very public apology by Marler. </p><p></p><p>Is it worthy of a citing? Perhaps if it crosses</p><p></p><p>9.12 A player must not verbally abuse anyone. Verbal abuse includes, but is not limited to, abuse based on: religion, colour, national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation.</p><p>Low-end: Mid-range: Top-end: Max:</p><p>6 weeks/matches 12 weeks/matches 18+ weeks/matches 52 weeks/matches</p><p></p><p>that threshold? Will also depend on evidence too but as Marler has apologised that is an admission of sorts. It could save further action by authorities (especially with Bristol non citing policy) or if other parties like citing commission decide to pursue, condemn him when he could have pleaded innocence or misheard words due to the lack of evidence. We shall see, I guess.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rinkadink, post: 1114049, member: 74190"] Yann Thomas looks pretty unimpressed also. I haven't seen any credible reports from members of the public hearing what was initially said by Marler. A publication put forward a different name than a "yo momma" jibe, but perhaps its best if we stop digging as everything important is out there. On the face of it this isn't your normal sledge and handbags, you can tell by the reaction of multiple people. You can tell by the media. You can tell by the very public apology by Marler. Is it worthy of a citing? Perhaps if it crosses 9.12 A player must not verbally abuse anyone. Verbal abuse includes, but is not limited to, abuse based on: religion, colour, national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation. Low-end: Mid-range: Top-end: Max: 6 weeks/matches 12 weeks/matches 18+ weeks/matches 52 weeks/matches that threshold? Will also depend on evidence too but as Marler has apologised that is an admission of sorts. It could save further action by authorities (especially with Bristol non citing policy) or if other parties like citing commission decide to pursue, condemn him when he could have pleaded innocence or misheard words due to the lack of evidence. We shall see, I guess. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Premiership Rugby 22/23 - Rd 13
Top