Not being smart, but is that not a good thing? I mean the RFU controlled franchises? Losing 2 clubs would be harsh on the two to go, but in general, while the private financiers have been making hay while the sun shines, looking after their own interest, now that times are tough they all hit the road? "The fact is that the vast majority of rugby clubs are reliant on shareholder capital for cash flow and that is not the ideal way to run a business."
On a more positive note. I heard on the radio the other day, something about 207 registered foreign players in the French Top 14 (about 15 in each squad) seriously hampering Lievremont's ability to select a top team. He isnt just experimenting, he doesnt have the players available anymore. England seem to be running down the same path so this change could enable "......................... them to develop cheaper home-grown talent rather than buying in expensive imports to avoid the drop. Johnson would also eventually benefit from having more England-qualified players to choose from, a factor, according to some in the RFU, which is behind England's precipitous decline."[/b]
I dont want to get caught up in a minor issue here, but look at the top 4 premiership teams (Football, not Rugby), there are barely 11 English players regularly getting first team football amongst them. From a possibly 44, only 11 are English. That has to impact on the international side.Look at the football team - all of a sudden it's doing well. Have we cut the number of foreigners in English football? no.[/b]
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gingergenius @ Dec 15 2008, 12:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I dont want to get caught up in a minor issue here, but look at the top 4 premiership teams (Football, not Rugby), there are barely 11 English players regularly getting first team football amongst them. From a possibly 44, only 11 are English. That has to impact on the international side.Look at the football team - all of a sudden it's doing well. Have we cut the number of foreigners in English football? no.[/b]
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Logorrhea @ Dec 15 2008, 06:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gingergenius @ Dec 15 2008, 12:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I dont want to get caught up in a minor issue here, but look at the top 4 premiership teams (Football, not Rugby), there are barely 11 English players regularly getting first team football amongst them. From a possibly 44, only 11 are English. That has to impact on the international side.Look at the football team - all of a sudden it's doing well. Have we cut the number of foreigners in English football? no.[/b]
http://www.thetimes.co.za/Sport/Article.aspx?id=882239
There are 207 foreigners from 22 countries plying their trade for Top 14 clubs this term, a startling average of just under 15 per club, and up from just 99 two years ago. There are also 165 in Pro D2, the second division.
At Brive, the foreigners number 24............... next in the list are newly-promoted big spenders Toulon, who have 22 foreigners on their roster, and Montpellier with 20.[/b]
No idea who those guys are, but if they are owners or investors, then yeah big problems.All that needs to happen is the Nigel Wrays and Keith Barwells of this world to say "sod it, I haven't got the money to waste any more" and pull out.[/b]
European Club rugby is facing its most serious and dire financial crisis since professionalism began and we're bickering about ring-fencing and club shedding in such a biased and one-eyed way that we all believe it was actually the RFU who caused the global credit crunch and financial melt-down in order to force Bristol and Newcastle into liquidation!
This. Is. SERIOUS BUSINESS, guys. Nobody is safe. All that needs to happen is the Nigel Wrays and Keith Barwells of this world to say "sod it, I haven't got the money to waste any more" and pull out. Every club in Europe from Sale all the way down to the Italian clubs are currently going over their balance sheets with a fine tooth comb to make sure that 1) they can keep going with their currently financial backing and 2) plan a fiscal escape route if they are left high and dry.
Now is not the time to blame Rob Andrews, gentlemen.[/b]
Thats easy to say from a SH perspective where you have no traditional club heritage.[/b]