Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Round 5: Sharks v Crusaders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fcukernaut" data-source="post: 104296"><p>I made my post right after the game, and well I just assumed that Canterbury had some logical reason for trying to attack instead of putting the ball into touch and having the game end right there before the Sharks even had a chance for a fluke try.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I guess I should explain my self further. The Sharks had no right to win it because Canterbury were up by 6 in extra time and apparently had only scored 2 tries, so no chance of a bonus point. Yet they chose to keep attacking to score another try instead of kicking the ball out of bounds and ending the game right there with a hard fought victory. Instead they turn the ball over after what two phases? And the Sharks go 70odd meters for a try and the kick that wins it. Do the Sharks deserve the victory? Of course they fought hard the whole way and ended the game in a dramatic way. But they shouldn't have won it, and that's what I meant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fcukernaut, post: 104296"] I made my post right after the game, and well I just assumed that Canterbury had some logical reason for trying to attack instead of putting the ball into touch and having the game end right there before the Sharks even had a chance for a fluke try. I guess I should explain my self further. The Sharks had no right to win it because Canterbury were up by 6 in extra time and apparently had only scored 2 tries, so no chance of a bonus point. Yet they chose to keep attacking to score another try instead of kicking the ball out of bounds and ending the game right there with a hard fought victory. Instead they turn the ball over after what two phases? And the Sharks go 70odd meters for a try and the kick that wins it. Do the Sharks deserve the victory? Of course they fought hard the whole way and ended the game in a dramatic way. But they shouldn't have won it, and that's what I meant. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Round 5: Sharks v Crusaders
Top