Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Rugby World Cup 2023
[RWC2019][Pool B] Round 1 - New Zealand vs. South Africa (21/09/2019)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umaga&#039;s Witness" data-source="post: 960020" data-attributes="member: 65365"><p>I don't think you are right about that framework. There definitely was not a high degree of danger. By that framework it would be a yellow, and by the has always been a rule framework du toit would have been yellowed too for the Hollywood. </p><p></p><p>Calling that highly dangerous is a bit rediculous. I mean it's subjective but it's nothing more than you'd see in a mild scrap. It's like when Coles threw Phipps, oh it was beautiful, and people were like "he fully should have been banned for life there, he like totally judo threw him". Yeah, judo, that popular sport around the world that mothers don't hesitate to get their children involved in, that sport where serious injuries pretty much never happen.</p><p></p><p>It would really send the wrong message if World rugby decided to cite read for this; it just isn't the type of danger they are trying to avoid. Psdt was not going to get paralysed for life from that....I mean maybe from the force at which he flung himself to the ground.</p><p></p><p>. I'm pretty confident it won't be cited, for that reason. but For the sake of people's safety we all have to hope im right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umaga's Witness, post: 960020, member: 65365"] I don’t think you are right about that framework. There definitely was not a high degree of danger. By that framework it would be a yellow, and by the has always been a rule framework du toit would have been yellowed too for the Hollywood. Calling that highly dangerous is a bit rediculous. I mean it’s subjective but it’s nothing more than you’d see in a mild scrap. It’s like when Coles threw Phipps, oh it was beautiful, and people were like “he fully should have been banned for life there, he like totally judo threw him”. Yeah, judo, that popular sport around the world that mothers don’t hesitate to get their children involved in, that sport where serious injuries pretty much never happen. It would really send the wrong message if World rugby decided to cite read for this; it just isn’t the type of danger they are trying to avoid. Psdt was not going to get paralysed for life from that....I mean maybe from the force at which he flung himself to the ground. . I’m pretty confident it won’t be cited, for that reason. but For the sake of people’s safety we all have to hope im right. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Rugby World Cup 2023
[RWC2019][Pool B] Round 1 - New Zealand vs. South Africa (21/09/2019)
Top