Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
Saddam to be Hanged
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tituslechmakus" data-source="post: 89369"><p>classic french view point eh?</p><p></p><p>I love how he "doesn't care about their lives" first of all, if it were for oil why are we still paying $2.50-3.10 a gallon? Secondly, thats their job, to protect this country, and let me see here if im not mistaken i believe Bush has the power to send the military into conflict if he sees fit, thats what they get paid for. Third, it wasnt just Bush who sent them over, look at the whole congress, senate, house of representatives.</p><p></p><p>Classic french viewpoint, with the classic french battle flag White on White.. oh yes i forgot you supply the weapons to saddam, hope the sanction would be lifted so your own oil giants could secure the oil.. so basically our troops are getting fired at by iraqi's who were supplied by your ignorant french selves.. dispicable.</p><p>[/b]</p></blockquote><p></p><p>yep classic french point of view ... i don't get your point saying bush could send the military into the conflict ? isn't it wgat has been done 3 years ago ? aren't the 2000 dead american, soldiers ? hum it seems we don't get the same news. or we don't understand it the same way ... did you know that TV news is not the absolute truth and god's expression ? </p><p>and you said it wasn't bush who sent them there ... but he controlled EVERYTHING in your country's decisons since yesterday (congress, senate, house of representatives) ... even his closest collaborators are liars (see collin powel's speach at the UN on weapons of mass destruction (probably french missiles btw)) ...</p><p>and i'm sorry but when US invaded irak, the first place secured in bagdad, which was i think at that time, more unattackable than any other place in the world, was the irakian ministery of pertroleum !!! hum it seems oil isn't involved in that conflict ...</p><p></p><p></p><p>and french tv is also not the truth but at least i know it ... it sometimes is quite useful to be a never-happy-sucker !!! at least you're less easy to lie to, being never happy and having all the time something to say !!!</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="tituslechmakus, post: 89369"] classic french view point eh? I love how he "doesn't care about their lives" first of all, if it were for oil why are we still paying $2.50-3.10 a gallon? Secondly, thats their job, to protect this country, and let me see here if im not mistaken i believe Bush has the power to send the military into conflict if he sees fit, thats what they get paid for. Third, it wasnt just Bush who sent them over, look at the whole congress, senate, house of representatives. Classic french viewpoint, with the classic french battle flag White on White.. oh yes i forgot you supply the weapons to saddam, hope the sanction would be lifted so your own oil giants could secure the oil.. so basically our troops are getting fired at by iraqi's who were supplied by your ignorant french selves.. dispicable. [/b][/quote] yep classic french point of view ... i don't get your point saying bush could send the military into the conflict ? isn't it wgat has been done 3 years ago ? aren't the 2000 dead american, soldiers ? hum it seems we don't get the same news. or we don't understand it the same way ... did you know that TV news is not the absolute truth and god's expression ? and you said it wasn't bush who sent them there ... but he controlled EVERYTHING in your country's decisons since yesterday (congress, senate, house of representatives) ... even his closest collaborators are liars (see collin powel's speach at the UN on weapons of mass destruction (probably french missiles btw)) ... and i'm sorry but when US invaded irak, the first place secured in bagdad, which was i think at that time, more unattackable than any other place in the world, was the irakian ministery of pertroleum !!! hum it seems oil isn't involved in that conflict ... and french tv is also not the truth but at least i know it ... it sometimes is quite useful to be a never-happy-sucker !!! at least you're less easy to lie to, being never happy and having all the time something to say !!! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Stuff
The Clubhouse Bar
Saddam to be Hanged
Top