Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Salary Cap Investigations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RedruthRFC" data-source="post: 981433" data-attributes="member: 58362"><p>AFAIK, we don't know if or how the "side investment" thing has been resolved (i.e. the information isn't in the public domain). IMO, the most likely scenario of that the 35 point deduction is the punishment for the coinvestment has drawn a line under that indescretion. Assuming Sarries were sitting within the cap as a result of the extra leeway that the "co-investments" provided, the sticky bit for them comes when they have to renegotiate contracts with players who would have been expecting a "co-investment" (or indeed to attract a new player to the club). If I was a Chairman of another Premiership club, I would be keen to formalise eactly what constitutes a benefit in kind in terms of the relationship between the players and club related shareholder of the business. If those who already have a co-investment in place continue to benefit from the consultancy / contacts of Wray and his mates, Saracens are continuing to circumvent the cap.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RedruthRFC, post: 981433, member: 58362"] AFAIK, we don't know if or how the "side investment" thing has been resolved (i.e. the information isn't in the public domain). IMO, the most likely scenario of that the 35 point deduction is the punishment for the coinvestment has drawn a line under that indescretion. Assuming Sarries were sitting within the cap as a result of the extra leeway that the "co-investments" provided, the sticky bit for them comes when they have to renegotiate contracts with players who would have been expecting a "co-investment" (or indeed to attract a new player to the club). If I was a Chairman of another Premiership club, I would be keen to formalise eactly what constitutes a benefit in kind in terms of the relationship between the players and club related shareholder of the business. If those who already have a co-investment in place continue to benefit from the consultancy / contacts of Wray and his mates, Saracens are continuing to circumvent the cap. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
Premiership Rugby / Premiership Cup
Salary Cap Investigations
Top