Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Stephen Jones...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RedruthRFC" data-source="post: 992680" data-attributes="member: 58362"><p>You're preaching to the converted. As I said, I was just guessing at the rationale, not debating the merit of the selection. As you say, given that Johnson was a better lock and a better captain, it makes no sense.</p><p></p><p>FWIW, it would depend how long the list is.Off the top of my head, in my time, he's definately behind Johnson, Eales, Retallick, Eales, O'Connell and Matfield, possibly Botha, Whitelock and Thorn. Going back, he's almost certainly behind Meads, possibly Willie John and probably a fair few other names that I'm forgetting or am unaware of.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RedruthRFC, post: 992680, member: 58362"] You're preaching to the converted. As I said, I was just guessing at the rationale, not debating the merit of the selection. As you say, given that Johnson was a better lock and a better captain, it makes no sense. FWIW, it would depend how long the list is.Off the top of my head, in my time, he's definately behind Johnson, Eales, Retallick, Eales, O'Connell and Matfield, possibly Botha, Whitelock and Thorn. Going back, he's almost certainly behind Meads, possibly Willie John and probably a fair few other names that I'm forgetting or am unaware of. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rugby Union
General Rugby Union
Stephen Jones...
Top